Traduction de «Factor degree value » (Anglais → Français) :

discount factor | annuity factor | present value factor | PVF

discount factor | present value factor | table factor

retardation factor | Rf | relative front | retention factor | transport value | rate factor

discount factor | present-value factor

certainty factor | confidence factor | plausibility value | CF [Abbr.]

branching factor | degree

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include self-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptom ...[+++]s, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

8. Calls on the Member States to find a way to provide a definition in national laws of what is to be considered as work of equal value, or a set of clear frameworks on the basis of which it would be possible to determine what should be regarded as work of equal value; considers that, in line with the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the value of work should be assessed and compared based on objective criteria, such as educational, professional and training requirements, skills, effort and responsibility, work undertaken and the nature of tasks involved – other factors ...[+++] can also be taken into account, such as working conditions, physical and mental stress, competence and degree of independence, planning and decision making;

The point I'm really trying to make here is that the tragedy of September 11 pointed out very clearly that in terms of values, in terms of commitments to defence, in terms of our NATO relationship that was triggered by the attack, in terms of the way in which we are dealing with cross-border issues with a high degree of trust, all of those factors give us now an opportunity to work in an asymmetrical way vis-à-vis the United States.

6. Considers that there is an inherent complexity in the regional economic structure and a certain degree of interdependence between economic, social and environmental issues; takes the view that, although GDP is still a relevant and rigorous measurement of development in the implementation of the programmes in regions and cities, it is sometimes likely to provide an incomplete impression that takes no account of the actual situation in the regions; considers, therefore, that a robust, fair, open and scientific debate on the merits of other indicators in addition to GDP should take place; underlines that whereas GDP should remain the ...[+++]main criterion for Objective 1, other criteria should also be used to categorise and prioritise support to Objective 2 regions, based on the respective social, economic, environmental, demographical and geographical challenges which they face, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006; notes that the Member States might consider investigating further indicators – environmental and social factors, for example – that give a broader picture of the well-being of society, the specific characteristics of Objectives 1 and 2 regions and cities and the added value produced by EU policies at national level, with the aim of not leaving vast and poorly developed areas outside the development offered by the common European cohesion policy;

Considering the degree of concentration on this market, where the biggest competitor has obtained a share estimated at approximately [. %] by value in 2007, these factors should be taken as an indication of direct exposure to competition.