Traduction de «Goal-directed proof procedure » (Anglais → Français) :

The best proof we have that the goal is to achieve a consensus is that we are not looking to change the numbers, but simply to guarantee that each party represented in the House is also represented on the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure. I would also just like to mention in passing that the subcommittee reports must be ratified by all members of the committee.

Concerning the burdensome nature of the registration procedure, that procedure requires the holder of a licence issued by another Member State to provide proof to the Netherlands authorities of compliance with the conditions for obtaining the licence provided for in the Community directive.

Given that contracting entities, which are not contracting authorities, might not have access to indisputable proof on the matter, it is appropriate to leave the choice whether or not to apply the exclusion criteria listed in Article 48(1) of Directive 2003/./EC [on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts] to these contracting entities.

As an example of a way to address this problem, one Member State reports that it is considering the inclusion of the reversal of burden of proof directly in the Rules of Civil Procedure (and not only in the equal treatment legislation)[50].

- the scope of the Directive should be extended to cover seizure of assets, and clear, workable standard procedural principles should accordingly be laid down to govern confiscation, freezing, and seizure of assets (for example to enable seizure to take place even when the culprit is not present in person, for instance if he has died or is on the run; possible avenues should be explored with a view to lightening the burden of proof applying when seizing assets obtained through crime; and a fair system should be established to ensure ...[+++] that seized assets are shared among the Member States according to their involvement in the investigations; in this context, it should be investigated whether those seized assets could be used as compensation for victims of crime);

extends the scope of the Directive to road transport operators using vehicles with maximum authorised weights (MAWs) exceeding 3,5 tonnes, subject to a specific derogation for undertakings using vehicles with MAWs between 3,5 and 6 tonnes for local, short-distance haulage; lays down more stringent requirements with regard to good repute, namely that this condition is not or is no longer satisfied, in particular, where the operator has been convicted of serious offences against certain rules relating to transport, including offences relating to rules for the protection of the environment and other rules concerning professional liability; increases the amounts which must be available to the undertaking to fulfil the requirements relating ...[+++]to financial standing: the undertaking must have available capital and reserves of at least ECU 9 000 when only one vehicle is used and ECU 5 000 for each additional vehicle, existing undertakings must fulfil the requirement of financial standing two years after the deadline for the implementation of the Directive; makes provision for a more detailed examination procedure and the updating and extension of the list of examination subjects, introduces a harmonised minimum level of knowledge required in each subject and retains different examinations depending on whether the applicant wishes to carry out national or international transport operations; retains the measure laid down by Directive 96/26/EC on permanent exemption from examination for applicants who provide proof of at least five years' practical experience, but adds the condition that applicants may be subject to a test, the arrangements for which shall be determined by the Member States in accordance with the list set out in the Directive; as a transitional measure, allows a Member State to require any natural person who holds a certificate of professional competence issued by another Member State when the holder was normally resident in the first Member State to p ...