Traduction de «Planned value » (Anglais → Français) :

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), if a selected listed financial institution is a pension entity of a particular pension plan or is a private investment plan that is a trust governed by a particular deferred profit sharing plan, a particular employees profit sharing plan or a particular retirement compensation arrangement and if, for any attribution point in respect of the financial institution for a particular period in which a fiscal year of the financial institution ends, the total of all amounts — each of which is the total value, on the attribution ...[+++] point, of the assets of the particular plan or arrangement that are reasonably attributable to a plan member (in this subsection referred to as a “known member”) of the financial institution in respect of which the financial institution knows, on December 31 of the calendar year in which the fiscal year ends, whether or not the plan member is resident in Canada on the attribution point and, in the case of plan members resident in Canada, the province in which the plan member is resident on the attribution point — is less than 50% of the total value, on the attribution point, of the assets of the particular plan or particular arrangement, the following rules apply:

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), if a selected listed financial institution is a pension entity of a particular pension plan or is a private investment plan that is a trust governed by a particular deferred profit sharing plan, a particular employees profit sharing plan or a particular retirement compensation arrangement and if, for any attribution point in respect of the financial institution for a particular period in which a fiscal year of the financial institution ends, the total of all amounts — each of which is the total value, on the attribution ...[+++] point, of the assets of the particular plan or arrangement that are reasonably attributable to a plan member (in this subsection referred to as a “known member”) of the financial institution in respect of which the financial institution knows, on December 31 of the calendar year in which the fiscal year ends, whether or not the plan member is resident in Canada on the attribution point and, in the case of plan members resident in Canada, the province in which the plan member is resident on the attribution point — is less than 50% of the total value, on the attribution point, of the assets of the particular plan or particular arrangement, the following rules apply:

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), if, for any attribution point in respect of an investment plan for a particular period in which a fiscal year of the investment plan ends, the total of all amounts — each of which is the total value of the particular units of the investment plan held on the attribution point either by a person that is an individual or a specified investor in the investment plan for the fiscal year and in respect of which the investment plan knows, on December 31 of the calendar year in which the fiscal year ends ...[+++], whether or not the person is resident in Canada on the attribution point and, in the case of individuals and specified investors resident in Canada, the province in which the person is resident on the attribution point or by a person that is neither an individual nor a specified investor in the investment plan for the fiscal year and in respect of which the investment plan knows, on December 31 of the calendar year, the person’s investor percentage for each participating province as of the attribution point — is less than 50% of the total value of the units of the investment plan on the attribution point, the following rules apply:

2. Stresses that the Treaty on European Union (TEU) places human rights, democracy and the rule of law at the centre of both internal and external EU policies, as provided for in Articles 2, 3 and 21 TEU, and consequently believes that respect for and the protection and promotion of these values should be developed in a coherent manner so that the EU is credible on the world stage; considers regrettable the Commission’s continued refusal to draft a Human Rights Action Plan to promote EU values in the external dimension of freedom, se ...[+++]curity and justice policies, as called for by the Council in the Stockholm Programme; welcomes the EU Strategic Framework on Human Rights and Democracy and the related action plan, which focus, inter alia, on the fight against human trafficking, women’s enjoyment of human rights and the issues of statelessness and arbitrary detention of migrants in third countries, but notes that the framework and accompanying action plan are no substitute for a Human Rights Action Plan;

15. Applauds the Commission’s transversal approach to IP and stresses the importance of a holistic approach that is both coherent and coordinated in areas where all other policy fields (such as competition, trade, energy, the environment, innovation, structural funds, the Single Market etc.) take into account the aims of RISE; recalls, in this connection, the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) which proves that successful, integrated and innovative action is possible in the field of IP, and that it generates growth and employment, promotes its own integration and is of a social partnership nature; holds that RISE should be based upon a horizontal rather than a vertical IP concept; believes that – while paying due attention to the b ...[+++]asic industries – sector-specific measures should support value chains and activity clusters with a high growth potential and must be connected to sectoral specialisation promoting high-tech and high-value-added strategies as well as innovation, skills, entrepreneurship, employment and creativity; notes, in this regard, the sectoral strategies in the motor vehicle (CARS 2020) and steel (steel action plan) industries and calls upon the Commission to adopt appropriate measures to implement those strategies; calls on the Member States and the Commission also to give sufficient focus to sectors with solid know-how and a high degree of RD investment and added-value creation including process innovation;

So that current technology will not simply be set in stone a second stage with ambitious limit values for 2006 will be required. Only mandatory values will give the industry the certainty it needs to make its plans.