Traduction de «Return directive » (Anglais → Français) :

Contact Group – Return Directive | Return Contact Group | Return Directive Contact Group

Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals | return directive

Standalone Rebate Direct Deposit [ (NOA) Blended Returns Direct Deposit | Refund/Rebate Short Direct Deposit ]

direct return system [ two-pipe direct-return system | two-pipe direct-return hot-water heating system ]

sign income tax return | validate income tax returns, certify income tax returns, authenticate income tax returns | sign income tax returns | sign tax returns

automatic fast return | fast return | quick return | rapid power return | rapid return

handling a return | handling returns | conduct returns | handle returns

completing transaction procedures for returned vehicles | finish transaction procedures for returned vehicles | carry out transaction procedures for returned vehicles | complete transaction procedures for returned vehicles

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include sel ...[+++]f-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptoms, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

Minors in return procedures Forced return monitoring Reintegration of returnees Situation of non-removable returnees Proper legal transposition of the Return Directive by Member States The practical impact of the Return Directive

The May 2013 judgment in case C 534-11 (Arslan) dealt with the relation between return related detention (under Directive 2008/115/EC) and Asylum related detention (under Directive 2003/9/EC) in a situation where a third-country national is detained under the Return Directive and submits an application for asylum with the objective of postponing return.

Between 2006 and December 2013, FRONTEX coordinated 209 Joint Return Operations (JROs) returning 10 855 people.[11] Since 2007, FRONTEX has provided standardised training for return officers focusing on safeguarding returnees’ fundamental rights and dignity during forced return operations.[12] Since Article 8(6) of the Return Directive on forced return monitoring became binding in 2010, half of all JROs have been the subject of monitoring by independent monitors who were physically present from the start of the operation until arrival at the airport of destination.

Despite these positive developments, and the fact that Member States have generally ensured that the Return Directive is transposed in their national law, there is still scope for improvement in the practical implementation of the Directive and of return policies in general, ensuring respect for fundamental rights standards (e.g. detention conditions, effective legal remedies) and effectiveness (e.g. faster procedures and higher rates of — voluntary — return).