Traduction de «Selective covering » (Anglais → Français) :

250. Welcomes the achievement of 99,35 % of the implementation of the LIFE+ operational budget, especially as the budget authority had increased the commitment appropriations by EUR 29 000 000 compared to the Commission's initial proposal; notes that, under the third call for the LIFE+ programme, 210 projects were selected covering actions in the fields of Nature Biodiversity (84), Environment Policy Governance (115), and Information Communication (11);

18. Observes that in general the FMPA does not contain a comprehensive agreement on the free movement of services, with the latter only being very selectively covered by specific bilateral agreements; stresses that a comprehensive agreement on the free movement of services would bring significant economic benefits for both sides; calls on the Commission and Switzerland, therefore, to explore the possibility of launching negotiations with the aim of concluding an all-encompassing agreement on the free movement of services;

18. Observes that in general the FMPA does not contain a comprehensive agreement on the free movement of services, with the latter only being very selectively covered by specific bilateral agreements; stresses that a comprehensive agreement on the free movement of services would bring significant economic benefits for both sides; calls on the Commission and Switzerland, therefore, to explore the possibility of launching negotiations with the aim of concluding an all-encompassing agreement on the free movement of services;

For the purposes of the present appeal, it must first be stated that the Civil Service Tribunal recalled that any decision relating to a specific individual which is taken under the Staff Regulations and adversely affects that person must state the reasons on which it is based, on the one hand, to enable the competent court to review the legality of the decision and, on the other, to provide the person concerned with the information necessary to allow him to ascertain whether or not the decision is well founded and to enable him to decide whether to bring an action. It added, however, referring to Case C‑254/95 P Parliament v Innamorati [1996] ECR I‑3423, paragraphs 24 to 28, that, as far as concerns decisions taken by a ...[+++]selection board in a competition, the obligation to state reasons must be reconciled with observance of the secrecy surrounding the proceedings of selection boards by virtue of Article 6 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations, secrecy which was instituted with a view to guaranteeing the independence of selection boards and the objectivity of their proceedings. Thus, observance of this secrecy precludes both disclosure of the attitudes adopted by individual members of selection boards and disclosure of any factors relating to individual or comparative assessments of candidates and that the obligation to state the reasons on which decisions of a selection board in a competition are based must take account of the nature of the proceedings concerned, which, at the stage of examination of the abilities of the candidates, are primarily comparative in character and accordingly covered by the secrecy inherent in those proceedings (paragraphs 30 and 31 of the judgment under appeal).

In that connection, although the Civil Service Tribunal, accepted that it was not for it to determine the items of information which the Commission must communicate to the person concerned in order to satisfy its obligation to state reasons, it observed, in particular, that certain additional particulars, such as the intermediate marks for each of the assessment criteria laid down in the notice of competition and the evaluation sheets, could have been sent to Mr Meierhofer with any items of information covered by the secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings blacked out wi ...[+++]thout disclosing either the attitudes adopted by individual members of the selection board or any factors relating to individual or comparative assessments of candidates (paragraphs 50 and 51 of the judgment under appeal).

The specification covered by the trade mark application does not contain any indication that the goods are meant for a select clientele and are marketed through a selective distribution system.