Traduction de «Setting indicator » (Anglais → Français) :

private sector debt (consolidated) as a percentage of GDP, with a threshold of 133%; private sector credit flow as a percentage of GDP, with an indicative threshold of 15%; year-on-year percentage change in deflated house prices, with an indicative threshold of 6%; public sector debt as a percentage of GDP with an indicative threshold of 60%; 3-year average of unemployment rate, with an indicative threshold of 10%; year-on-year percentage change in total financial liabilities of the financial sector, with an indicative threshold of 16.5%.

3 year average of the current account balance as a percentage of GDP, with indicative thresholds of +6% and - 4%; net international investment position (NIIP) as a percentage of GDP, with an indicative threshold of -35%; the NIIP shows the difference between a country's external financial assets and its external financial liabilities; 5 years percentage change of export market shares measured in values, with an indicative threshold of -6%; 3 years percentage change in nominal unit labour cost(ULC), with an indicative thresholds of +9% for euro area countries and +12% for non-euro area countries. 3 years percentage change in real effe ...[+++]ctive exchange rates(REER) based on HICP deflators, relative to 41 other industrial countries, with indicative thresholds of­ -/+5% for euro area countries and -/+11% for non-euro area countries; the REER shows price competitiveness relative to the main trading partners.

Conditions for reporting using another indicator (A/B) INSTEAD OF a specific core indicator as in Annex IV — if an organisation decides not to report under (a) specific indicator(s) as provided for in Annex IV, but chooses another instead, that indicator also has to provide for an input A and an output B. Using this flexibility should always be justified with reference to the environmental review, showing how the option chosen helps to better indicate the relevant performance.

In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards laying down rules on the form of the product specification; laying down detailed rules on the form and content of the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications; defining the technical characteristics of the Union symbols and indications as well as the rules on their use on products, including the appropriate linguistic versions to be used; granting and extending transitional periods for temporary derogations for use of protected designations of o ...[+++]rigin and protected geographical indication; laying down detailed rules on the form and content of the register of traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down rules for the protection of traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down all measures relating to forms, procedures and other technical details for the application of Title IV; laying down rules for the use of optional quality terms; laying down rules for the uniform protection of indications, abbreviations and symbols referring to the quality schemes; laying down detailed rules on the procedure, form and presentation of applications for registration and of oppositions; rejecting the application; deciding on the registration of a name if an agreement has not been reached; laying down detailed rules on the procedure, form and presentation of an amendment application; cancelling the registration of a protected designation of origin, a protected geographical indication or a traditional speciality guaranteed; and laying down detailed rules on the procedure and form of the cancellation process and on the presentation of the requests for cancellation.

the new strategic goal set for the European Union by the Lisbon European Council of 23-24 March 2000 and reaffirmed by the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001, "to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth, with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion"; the conclusions of the Spring 2005 European Council, which underline that "human capital is Europe's most important asset" ; the Lisbon European Council's affirmation that Europe's education and training systems need to adapt both to the demands of the knowledge society and to the need for a higher level and quality of employment. Hence, the mandate from the Lisbon European Council to the Edu ...[+++]cation Council "to undertake a general reflection on concrete future objectives of education systems, focusing on common concerns and priorities while respecting national diversity with a view to contributing to the Luxembourg and Cardiff processes" ; the Barcelona European Council conclusions of 15-16 March 2002 , which endorsed the work programme, including an indicative list of indicators to be used to measure progress towards the implementation of the thirteen concrete objectives through the Open Method of Coordination, with the aim for European education and training systems of becoming "a world reference for quality by 2010", and which called for the establishment of a linguistic competence indicator; the reaffirmation of the central role of indicators and the five reference levels in giving directions and measuring progress in the field of education and training towards the Lisbon goals ; the Joint Interim Report of February 2004, which underlined the need to improve the quality and comparability of existing indicators, particularly in the field of lifelong learning, and its request that the Standing Group on Indicators and Benchmarks and all existing Working Groups propose, by the end of 2004, a limited list of new indi ...

Moreover, such financing is to be degressive: in the second, third, fourth and fifth years, it is to amount to 80%, 60% 40% and 20% respectively of the income aid granted in the first year (vi) Community contribution to the financing of the aid The Community will finance expenditure on the granting of eligible income aids according to the category of the region where the holding concerned is located, at the following rates: - 70% where the regional synthetic indicator is less than 75% of the Community indicator (Category I); - 45% wh ...[+++]ere the regional synthetic indicator is equal to or greater than 75% but less than 85% of the Community indicator (Category II); - 20% where the regional synthetic indicator is equal to or greater than 85% but less than 95% of the Community indicator (Category III); - 10% where the regional synthetic indicator is equal to or greater than 95% of the Community indicator (Category IV).