Also, given that park wardens have literally been tied up at gunpoint and that provincial conservation officers as well as Department of Fisheries and Oceans officers are equipped with sidearms, while national park wardens are provided with soft body armour to protect them from bullets, how is it not justified yet that this type of protection is warranted for these officers as it is in the other departments?
De plus, étant donné que les gardes des parcs ont littéralement eu les mains liées à la pointe d'un fusil, que les agents de conservation provinciaux ainsi que les agents du ministère des Pêches et des Océans ont des revolvers, alors que les gardes des parcs nationaux n'ont que des gilets pare-balles souples, comment peut-on dire que ce genre de protection n'est pas justifié?
