Traduction de «Three field system » (Anglais → Français) :

25. Holds the view that broader cooperation on a regional level and with the EU in sectors such as economy, transport, energy and environment is essential for the optimal development of the sectors themselves and for ensuring stability in the region, but that cooperation should also embrace the building of human capital in the whole region as a long-term investment; welcomes the fact that all three countries benefit from the EU's Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) and takes note that they all qualify for the GSP+ for sustainable ...[+++] development and good governance; notes that regional cooperation in the judicial and police fields and the establishment of integrated border management are essential for further promoting mobility in the region and towards the EU; deplores the fact that implementation of regional projects with the involvement of all three countries is still hindered by the persistence of unresolved conflicts;

Fourthly, Mr President, I feel that this is a good outcome for Parliament, because we have managed to achieve most of what we had been fighting for, of which I should like to highlight the following: Community management of the central system, under the democratic control of the European Parliament and the legal control of the Court of Justice (the creation of a Community agency within five years, established in codecision with Parliament, is provided for); the fact that there is greater harmonisation of alerts in the Schengen Information System (SIS), whereby entry into the Schengen area can be refused (the Commission is invited to submit initiative ...[+++]s, within three years, aimed at achieving higher levels of harmonisation); the fact that European Arrest Warrants are stored in the SIS central system; the fact that we are using biometric data as a research field only after the drafting of a report to be submitted to Parliament on which Parliament will have its say; the fact that we have clearly strengthened the rules on data protection and the rights of individuals in relation to the system, the fact that the supervision system has been strengthened at both European and national level; and the obligation to draw up reports in order to increase transparency regarding the overall functioning of the system.

– (PT) My vote is intended above all to highlight three points that I believe are crucial: firstly, what is known as ‘self-handling’, must not be surreptitiously subverted, opening the door to all types of opportunism and market distortion. Instead, it should properly be restricted to the ship’s own crew and undertaken in conjunction with the competent port operator; secondly, the system of pilotage in ports must be kept outside the scope of the directive and reserved for national legislation; thirdly, it is crucial that the way is ...[+++]opened for clear rules on State aid in this field to be properly defined, as suggested during the debates on the Green Paper and on which, regrettably, the text of the directive still says very little.

1. Wishes to compliment the European Commission on its communication, which demonstrates a broad and complete analysis and includes sensible proposals, but considers that there is a need for a clearer and unambigous formulation of the political aims and principles underlying the further development of the European telecommunications market and a further consideration of a number of themes, such as the concept of competition, the question of dealing with an imperfect market, the proposed system of Significant Market Power and Dominant Positions, general authorisation and auctions, and the institutional framework with respect to the democr ...[+++]atic basis and certainty for market players; considers that the Commission should promote the creation of a level playing field in relation to the three objectives of the 1999 Review and stresses that, in some Member States, no auctions of UMTS frequencies are held, as a result of which some ICT companies obtain UMTS frequencies at far lower prices than their competitors; points out that this does not create a level playing field; observes that the influence of governments on national ICT companies is regulated in very different ways (e.g. by means of minority holdings or golden shares) and that this has constituted an obstacle to mergers between European ICT companies; calls on the Commission to create a level playing field in this respect too;

This proposed three broad headings - access for all; a high level of quality of care; and the financial sustainability of systems - as a basis for a co-operative exchange in this field.

In order to capitalise on human investment at all levels, three types of horizontal actions should be launched: continuous observation of practices, uses and technologies; the pooling of conclusions and analyses by experts and by education system managers; and the definition of prospective scenarios to fuel discussion of the various potential options for management and generalisation of innovations which are effective, i.e. which has proved its merits in the field.