Traduction de «Yellow and orange card procedure » (Anglais → Français) :

TERMINOLOGIE
voir aussi les traductions en contexte ci-dessous

procedure for monitoring the subsidiarity principle | subsidiarity control mechanism | yellow and orange card procedure

http://iate.europa.eu/FindTerm (...) (...) [HTML] [2017-12-31]

procédure du carton jaune ou du carton orange

http://iate.europa.eu/FindTerm (...) (...) [HTML] [2017-12-31]

http://iate.europa.eu/FindTerm (...) [HTML] [2017-12-31]

orange card procedure

http://iate.europa.eu/FindTerm (...) (...) [HTML] [2017-12-31]

procédure du carton orange

http://iate.europa.eu/FindTerm (...) (...) [HTML] [2017-12-31]

http://iate.europa.eu/FindTerm (...) [HTML] [2017-12-31]

yellow card procedure

http://iate.europa.eu/FindTerm (...) (...) [HTML] [2017-12-31]

procédure du carton jaune

http://iate.europa.eu/FindTerm (...) (...) [HTML] [2017-12-31]

http://iate.europa.eu/FindTerm (...) [HTML] [2017-12-31]

TRADUCTIONS EN CONTEXTE

23. Highlights the fact that in 2011 the Commission received 64 reasoned opinions within the meaning of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, which represents a considerable increase in comparison to 2010; notes, however, that these 64 reasoned opinions represented barely 10 % of the total of 622 opinions forwarded to the Commission by national parliaments in 2011 within the terms of the political dialogue in question; also draws attention to the fact that no Commission proposal received a sufficient number of reasoned opinions to trigger the ‘yellow or orange card ...[+++] procedures’ under the Protocol; notes, however, that on 22 May 2012 a ’yellow card procedure’ was for the first time triggered by a Commission proposal (proposal for a Council regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action within the context of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services, i.e. the proposal for the ‘Monti II’ Regulation); stresses that the Commission withdrew the proposal, not because it considered the principle of subsidiarity to have been infringed upon, but because it realised that the proposal was unlikely to gain enough political support in Parliament and the Council to ensure its adoption;

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-02-03]

23. souligne qu'en 2011, la Commission a reçu 64 avis motivés, au sens du protocole n° 2, portant sur l'application des principes de subsidiarité et de proportionnalité, ce qui représente une forte augmentation par rapport à 2010; observe, néanmoins, que ces 64 avis motivés ne représentent que 10 % de l'ensemble des 622 avis envoyés par les parlements nationaux à la Commission en 2011, dans le cadre de leur dialogue politique; attire en outre l'attention sur le fait qu'aucune proposition de la Commission ne s'est vu opposer un nombre suffisant d'avis motivés pour entraîner, comme le prévoit le protocole, un réexame ...[+++]

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-02-03]

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) [HTML] [2014-02-03]

22. Highlights the fact that in 2011 the Commission received 64 reasoned opinions within the meaning of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, which represents a considerable increase in comparison to 2010; notes, however, that these 64 reasoned opinions represented barely 10 % of the total of 622 opinions forwarded to the Commission by national parliaments in 2011 within the terms of the political dialogue in question; also draws attention to the fact that no Commission proposal received a sufficient number of reasoned opinions to trigger the ‘yellow or orange card ...[+++] procedures’ under the Protocol; notes, however, that on 22 May 2012 a ‘yellow card procedure’ was for the first time triggered by a Commission proposal (proposal for a Council regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action within the context of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services, i.e. the proposal for the ‘Monti II’ Regulation); stresses that the Commission withdrew the proposal, not because it considered the principle of subsidiarity to have been infringed upon, but because it realised that the proposal was unlikely to gain enough political support in Parliament and the Council to ensure its adoption;

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-02-02]

22. souligne qu'en 2011, la Commission a reçu 64 avis motivés, au sens du protocole n° 2, portant sur l'application des principes de subsidiarité et de proportionnalité, ce qui représente une forte augmentation par rapport à 2010; observe, néanmoins, que ces 64 avis motivés ne représentent que 10 % de l'ensemble des 622 avis envoyés par les parlements nationaux à la Commission en 2011, dans le cadre de leur dialogue politique; attire en outre l'attention sur le fait qu'aucune proposition de la Commission ne s'est vu opposer un nombre suffisant d'avis motivés pour entraîner, comme le prévoit le protocole, un réexame ...[+++]

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-02-02]

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) [HTML] [2014-02-02]

13. Highlights the fact that in 2011 the Commission received 64 reasoned opinions within the meaning of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, which represents a considerable increase in comparison to 2010; notes, however, that these 64 reasoned opinions represented barely 10 % of the total 622 opinions forwarded to the Commission by national parliaments in 2011 within the terms of the political dialogue in question; also draws attention to the fact that no Commission proposal received a sufficient number of reasoned opinions to trigger the ‘yellow or orange card ...[+++] procedures’ under the Protocol; notes, however, that on 22 May 2012 a ‘yellow card procedure’ was for the first time triggered by a Commission proposal (proposal for a Council regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action within the context of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services, i.e. the proposal for the ‘Monti II’ Regulation); stresses that the Commission withdrew the proposal, not because it considered the principle of subsidiarity to have been infringed upon, but because it realised that the proposal was unlikely to gain enough political support in Parliament and the Council to ensure its adoption;

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-02-02]

13. souligne qu'en 2011, la Commission a reçu 64 avis motivés, au sens du protocole n° 2, portant sur l'application des principes de subsidiarité et de proportionnalité, ce qui représente une forte augmentation par rapport à 2010; observe, néanmoins, que ces 64 avis motivés ne représentent que 10 % de l'ensemble des 622 avis envoyés par les parlements nationaux à la Commission en 2011, dans le cadre de leur dialogue politique; attire en outre l'attention sur le fait qu'aucune proposition de la Commission ne s'est vu opposer un nombre suffisant d'avis motivés pour entraîner, comme le prévoit le protocole, un réexame ...[+++]

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-02-02]

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) [HTML] [2014-02-02]

14 chambers of national Parliaments from 11 Member States (Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia) sent reasoned opinions claiming that the proposal was in breach of the principle of subsidiarity. This triggered the subsidiarity control mechanism (the so-called 'yellow card' procedure).

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-r (...) (...) [HTML] [2016-07-19]

Quatorze chambres de parlements nationaux de onze États membres (Bulgarie, République tchèque, Croatie, Danemark, Estonie, Hongrie, Lettonie, Lituanie, Pologne, Roumanie et Slovaquie) ont émis des avis motivés affirmant que la proposition n’était pas conforme au principe de subsidiarité, ce qui a déclenché le mécanisme de contrôle de la subsidiarité (la procédure dite du «carton jaune»).

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-r (...) (...) [HTML] [2016-07-19]

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-r (...) [HTML] [2016-07-19]

For more results, go to https://pro.wordscope.com to translate your documents with Wordscope Pro!

Now, obviously when there is an elevation, we know that something is happening, but there was nothing in the way of procedural guidelines or any other guidelines to tell cities, organizations or residents what actions to take when these colour codes changed from yellow to orange and from orange to red.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-09-03]

Naturellement, quand le degré d'alerte monte, on sait que quelque chose est en train de se passer, mais il n'existe aucune ligne directrice pour dire aux villes, aux organisations ou aux citoyens ce qu'ils doivent faire lorsque le code passe de jaune à orange ou d'orange à rouge.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2014-09-03]

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/ (...) [HTML] [2014-09-03]

Transposes the new procedures for the national Parliaments with regard to the respect for the principle of subsidiarity (‘yellow card’ procedure and ‘orange card’ procedure) into the Rules of Procedure.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2009-11-22]

Le présent amendement transpose dans le règlement les nouvelles procédures concernant les parlements nationaux et le respect du principe de subsidiarité (procédures du "carton jaune" et du "carton orange").

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2009-11-22]

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) [HTML] [2009-11-22]

It therefore stops the "identification" procedure that had started with a yellow card to Korea in November 2013 and the Philippines in June 2014.

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-r (...) (...) [HTML] [2015-04-20]

Cela met donc un terme à la procédure de «recensement» qui avait débuté par un carton jaune adressé à la Corée en novembre 2013 et aux Philippines en juin 2014.

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-r (...) (...) [HTML] [2015-04-20]

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-r (...) [HTML] [2015-04-20]

Transposes the new procedures for the national Parliaments with regard to the respect for the principle of subsidiarity ('yellow card' procedure and 'orange card' procedure) into the Rules of Procedure.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2009-04-26]

Le présent amendement transpose dans le règlement les nouvelles procédures concernant les parlements nationaux et le respect du principe de subsidiarité (procédures du "carton jaune" et du "carton orange").

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) (...) [HTML] [2009-04-26]

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ (...) [HTML] [2009-04-26]

(Identity card with photo for persons entitled to privileges and immunities, in red, yellow, blue, green, brown, grey and orange, issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal (...) (...) [HTML] [2008-12-31]

(Carte d'identité avec photo (rouge, jaune, bleu, vert, brun, gris et orange) pour les titulaires de privilèges et d'immunités, délivrée par le Ministère fédéral des affaires étrangères)

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal (...) (...) [HTML] [2008-12-31]

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal (...) [HTML] [2008-12-31]

New card formats (gray, brown, blue, green, yellow, orange and red):

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal (...) (...) [HTML] [2005-12-31]

Nouveaux formats (gris, marron, bleu, vert, jaune, orange et rouge):

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal (...) (...) [HTML] [2005-12-31]

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal (...) [HTML] [2005-12-31]

D'autres ont cherché : orange card procedure subsidiarity control mechanism yellow and orange card procedure yellow card procedure Yellow and orange card procedure

datacenter (1): www.wordscope.fr (v4.0.br)

'Yellow and orange card procedure' ->

Date index: 2023-03-20