Traduction de «attention value » (Anglais → Français) :

attention strength | attention value | awareness value

attention strength [ attention value ]

capture attention | get people's attention | capture people's attention | capturing people's attention

archival value [ historical value | continuing value | enduring value | secondary value | long-term value | permanent value | indefinite value | lasting value | research value | evidential-archival value ]

exploitable value | exploitation value | liquidation value | realisation value | realization value | utilization value

low calorific value | low heat value | lower heating value | net calorific value | net heating value | net specific energy | LHV [Abbr.] | NCV [Abbr.]

value to the firm | deprival value | entity value | entity-specific value | opportunity value | retention value | value to the business

company's value | enterprise's value | value of company culture | value of enterprise culture | entrepreneurial culture value

Points out that while private, own-brand labelled products can bring increased value, choice and ‘fair trade’ products to consumers, they also represent a strategic issue in the medium- and long-term, as they introduce a horizontal dimension to competition in respect of industrial brands that had never previously been a factor and that can give an unfair and anti-competitive position to retailers, who become both customer and competitor; draws attention to the existence of a ‘risk threshold’ beyond which the market penetration of own ...[+++] brands in a given category of product could turn the current positive effects of own brands into negative effects, and provide a disincentive as regards the innovative efforts of many companies; insists, therefore, that the issue of private own-brands requires particular attention from the Commission and competition authorities, specifically with regard to the need to assess the potential long-term consequences for the supply chain and the position of farmers within it, while bearing in mind that consumer habits in Member States vary.

2. Notes with concern that the Court's report emphasises the issues related to the valuation of the SIS II, VIS and EURODAC systems in the Agency’s accounts; notes furthermore that although the valuation was not materially misstated, the Court found those issues as essential and drew attention to this matter; notes that the operational management of those systems is the Agency's core task and that the systems were transferred from the Commission to the Agency in May 2013 by way of a non-exchange transaction; notes moreover that in the absence of reliable and complete information in respect of the total development cost of those sys ...[+++]tems, the value of the systems was recorded in the Agency’s accounts at their net book values as per the Commission’s books and updated at year-end; is concerned that those values relate mainly to hardware and off-the-shelf software components and do not include software development costs;

2. Notes with concern that the Court's report emphasises the issues related to the valuation of the SIS II, VIS and EURODAC systems in the Agency’s accounts; notes furthermore that although the valuation was not materially misstated, the Court found those issues as essential and drew attention to this matter; notes that the operational management of those systems is the Agency's core task and that the systems were transferred from the Commission to the Agency in May 2013 by way of a non-exchange transaction; notes moreover that in the absence of reliable and complete information in respect of the total development cost of those sys ...[+++]tems, the value of the systems was recorded in the Agency’s accounts at their net book values as per the Commission’s books and updated at year-end; is concerned that those values relate mainly to hardware and off-the-shelf software components and do not include software development costs;

15. Applauds the Commission’s transversal approach to IP and stresses the importance of a holistic approach that is both coherent and coordinated in areas where all other policy fields (such as competition, trade, energy, the environment, innovation, structural funds, the Single Market etc.) take into account the aims of RISE; recalls, in this connection, the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) which proves that successful, integrated and innovative action is possible in the field of IP, and that it generates growth and employment, promotes its own integration and is of a social partnership nature; holds that RISE should be based upon a horizontal rather than a vertical IP concept; believes that – while paying due ...[+++]attention to the basic industries – sector-specific measures should support value chains and activity clusters with a high growth potential and must be connected to sectoral specialisation promoting high-tech and high-value-added strategies as well as innovation, skills, entrepreneurship, employment and creativity; notes, in this regard, the sectoral strategies in the motor vehicle (CARS 2020) and steel (steel action plan) industries and calls upon the Commission to adopt appropriate measures to implement those strategies; calls on the Member States and the Commission also to give sufficient focus to sectors with solid know-how and a high degree of RD investment and added-value creation including process innovation;