Traduction de «canadian table » (Anglais → Français) :

Canadian Table of Frequency Allocations [ Canadian Table ]

Canadian Forces Air Decompression Tables [ Canadian Forces Air Tables | CF Air Decompression Tables | CF Air Tables ]

Life Tables, Canada, Provinces and Territories [ Health Reports, Supplement, Life Tables, Canada and Provinces | Life Tables, Canada and Provinces | Canadian Life Tables | Provincial and Regional Lifetables ]

Canadian cultivator 3)Canadian spring-tine cultivator | cultivator,C-type

Canadian National Canadian Pacific | CNCP [Abbr.]

canadian pondweed | canadian waterweed | common elodia

arrange the tables | arranged tables | arrange tables | create table seating plan

control table saw | handle table saw | activate table saw | operate table saw

allocate gaming tables | schedule tables for gaming | schedule gaming tables | schedule use of gaming tables

light-table | light table | checking table | shining table | shining up table | shining-up table | layout table | lining up table

First, ``Defence of North America: A Canadian Responsibility,'' in September 2002; second, ``.Update on Canada's Military Crisis: A View from the Bottom Up,'' tabled in November 2002; third, ``The Myth of Security at Canada's Airports,'' tabled in January 2003; fourth, ``Canada's Coastlines: The Longest Under-Defended Borders in the World,'' tabled in October 2003; and fifth, ``National Emergencies: Canada's Fragile Front Lines —- An Upgrade Strategy,'' tabled in March 2004.

The question is as follows: With respect to Bill C-32, An Act to amend the Copyright Act: (a) how was this Bill developed; (b) did the government request any specific studies for this Bill and, if so, (i) what was the subject of these studies, (ii) what conclusions did they reach, (iii) what recommendations did they put forward, (iv) what methodology was followed in the studies, (v) on what date were the studies requested, (vi) on what date were the studies submitted, (vii) do the studies contain quantitative analyses (are they supported by data), (viii) what are the quantitative data and in what context are they presented; (c) did the government request an analysis of the Bill’s economic impact on creators’ income and, if so, (i) what op ...[+++]tions did the analysis offer, (ii) what data were collected as part of the analysis, (iii) what conclusions did the analysis reach, (iv) were the ministers of Canadian Heritage and Industry Canada aware of this analysis before it began, (v) on what date was the analysis requested, (vi) on what date was the analysis tabled, (vii) who or which department requested the analysis, (viii) who or which department conducted the analysis, (ix) what guidelines were issued regarding the analysis, (x) to whom or to which department was the analysis submitted, (xi) did the Minister of Canadian Heritage read the analysis after it was submitted, (xii) did the Minister of Industry read the analysis after it was submitted, (xiii) was a minister or an employee of a minister involved in the analysis, or did a minister or an employee of a minister interact with the researchers at any time during the analysis, (xiv) what methodology was followed in the analysis, (xv) did the author(s) of the analysis state the methodological considerations or limitations, either in writing or verbally, (xvi) what are the methodological considerations or limitations stated by the author(s) of this analysis, (xvii) does the analysis contain a quantitative component (is ...

(Return tabled) Question No. 65 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to the climate summit in Copenhagen and climate change: (a) what criteria needed to be met in order to be part of the Canadian delegation; (b) what were the name and position of each member of the Canadian delegation, what expertise and skills did each bring to the table, and for what time period were each in Copenhagen; (c) what was the total budget for the delegation, from flights to accommodation and living expenses; (d) what, if any, offsets were purchased for the delegation; (e) what ...[+++] was the description, in detail, of the Canadian climate change plan, and when will it be revealed to Canadians; (f) who were all the stakeholders consulted in the development of the plan, and how does each goal/target reflect or does not reflect each stakeholder's views; (g) did the government include the voice of Canadians who are on the “front line of climate change”, and were those who will be impacted by climate change meaningfully involved, and, if so, how; (h) what accountability measures, if any, were in place to ensure that the Canadian delegation would be responsible to those Canadians who will be particularly impacted (e.g., those living in low-lying areas and Aboriginal peoples); (i) what has been the stakeholder response to the plan, particularly from business, NGOs, scientists, and all stakeholders, and if available, what is the actual response of stakeholders' consulted; (j) what were the specific goals of the Canadian delegation, and how do they compare (in advance and afterward) with those of the G20 or OECD in terms of baseline, absolute reductions, and target date; (k) did the Canadian delegation support the notion that climate change is not just an environmental issue, but rather a human rights issue and a justice issue and, if so, what is the description, in detail, of Canada's position; (l) did the Canadian delegation listen to the world's “frontline voice”, such as Bangladesh's and the ...

Although the EU clearly expressed its concern at the WTO incompatibility of the envisaged measures, on 18 October 2006 the Canadian Government formally tabled Bill C-28 in the Canadian Parliament.