Traduction de «director law international » (Anglais → Français) :

35. Reaffirms its support for the readmission agreement with the EU, which entered into force on 1 October 2014; encourages the Commission to continue to monitor progress by Turkey in fulfilling the requirements of its visa liberalisation roadmap; welcomes the effective efforts made to meet the criteria identified in the visa liberalisation roadmap; recalls that the visa liberalisation dialogue is a merit-based process and that Turkey should meet all the requirements set out in the visa roadmap, including, particularly, the full and effective implementation of all provisions of the readmission agreement; reiterates Turkey’s obligation to fully and effectively implement the readmission agreement and the visa liberalisation vis-à-vis all ...[+++]Member States, including non-discriminatory visa-free access to the Turkish territory for the citizens of all EU Member States; calls on Turkey to implement the existing bilateral readmission agreements fully and effectively; recalls that Turkey is one of the key transit countries for irregular migration to the EU and calls for the improvement of Turkey’s cross-border cooperation with neighbouring EU Member States in this respect; welcomes the entry into force of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection and the establishment of the General Directorate for Migration Management (GDMM) in April 2014 as substantial steps towards alignment with EU standards on international protection of regular and irregular migrants; notes that cooperation between Turkey and all EU Member States, aiming in particular at reinforcing the management of the common borders with all EU Member States, needs to be increased; emphasises the need for Turkey to further strengthen border security in order to combat irregular migration to EU countries;

3. Welcomes the signing of the readmission agreement between the EU and Turkey and the initiation of the visa liberalisation dialogue on 16 December 2013; stresses the importance of achieving a common understanding between Turkey and the EU on the relevance for both parties of the readmission agreement and the roadmap leading to visa liberalisation; calls, in this connection, for the EU to provide full technical and financial support to Turkey for the implementation of the readmission agreement, and on Turkey to put in place adequate policies aimed at providing effective international protection to asylum-seekers and securing respect f ...[+++]or the human rights of migrants; takes the view that the establishment of the General Directorate of Migration Management and the implementation of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection are a first positive step in that direction; recalls that Turkey is one of the key transit countries for irregular migration to the EU and stresses the importance of swift ratification of the readmission agreement and its effective implementation vis-à-vis all the Member States; calls on Turkey to implement the existing bilateral readmission agreements fully and effectively; stresses the clear benefits of facilitating access to the EU for business people, academics, students and representatives of civil society and calls on Turkey and the Commission to move forward in dialogue with a view to making substantial progress on visa liberalisation;

There could be a Human Rights and Democracy Directorate, an international law directorate or a structure with another name but the same content.

5. Points out that at the end of 2008 the Commission’s Directorate General on Health and Consumers published the results of two studies on collective redress mechanisms in the Member States and possible barriers to the internal market resulting from Member States' differing legislation; points out also that the Commission published a green paper on the Community’s possible options for action in the field of consumer protection law and has announced the publication of another policy paper in 2009; stresses that measures at Community ...[+++]level must not lead to arbitrary and unnecessary fragmentation of procedural nationals laws and that, therefore, careful consideration should be given to whether, and to what extent, a horizontal or integrated approach should be chosen to facilitate out-of-court settlements and the prosecution of damage compensation claims; calls on the Commission, therefore, to undertake an examination of the possible legal bases and how to proceed in a horizontal or integrated way though not necessarily with a single horizontal instrument, and to refrain, in the meantime, from presenting any collective redress mechanism for victims of EC competition law infringements without allowing Parliament to participate in their adoption in the codecision procedure;

This is regarded as particularly important in the case of the Directorate General for Justice, Freedom and Security as regards its work in the field of civil law (private international law, mediation, alternative dispute resolution, legal aid) and in the case of the Directorate General for Internal Market and Services.

Delegation: From Vietnam: Dr. Nguyen Dinh Loc, Vietnamese Minister of Justice and head of delegation; Dr. Hoang The Lien, Director, Law Institute, Ministry of Justice; Dr. Nguyen Duc Giao, Deputy Director, Department of Legal Dissemination and Education, Ministry of Justice, and Senior Assistant to the Minister; Nguyen Khanh Ngoc, Legal Expert, Department of International Law and Cooperation, Ministry of Justice, and Interpreter; Nguyen Quoc Cuong, Counsellor and Deputy Head of Mission of the Embassy of Vietnam in Ottawa.