Traduction de «for any reasonably » (Anglais → Français) :

at all reasonable hours | at any reasonable time

for any reason [ for one reason or another ]

beyond a reasonable doubt | beyond any reasonable doubt

fail to comply with any reasonable requirement

at any reasonable time

check sales area for security reasons | monitor sales area for reasons of security | monitor sales area for security reasons | monitoring sales area for security reasons

operating reasons | pressing reasons | urgent reasons

use logical thinking | utilise logical thinking | apply local reasoning to problems | use logical reasoning

determinants of quality of fish products | factors in quality of fish products | quality of fish products | reasons for quality variation in fish

goal directed reasoning | goal-directed reasoning | goal driven reasoning

34 (1) An inspector may at any reasonable time enter any place that the inspector believes on reasonable grounds is occupied, other than a dwelling-house or any part of a place that is designed to be used and is being used as a permanent or temporary dwelling-house, and in which the inspector believes on reasonable grounds there is any regulated product produced for, or intended to be marketed in, interprovincial or export trade and examine any books, records or other documents in that place that the inspector believes on reasonable grounds contain any information relating to the regulated product and make copies thereof or take extracts ...[+++] therefrom, and may require any person to produce, for inspection, or for the purpose of obtaining copies thereof or extracts therefrom, any books, records or documents relating to that product that are located in any other place.

(a) subject to subsection (5), enter and inspect, at any reasonable time, any place that is owned by or under the control of any Canadian carrier in which the inspector believes on reasonable grounds there is any document, information or thing relevant to the enforcement of this Act or any special Act or any place in which the inspector believes on reasonable grounds there is any document, information or thing relevant to the enforcement of Division 1.1 of Part 16.1 of the Canada Elections Act, and examine the document, information or thing or remove it for examination or reproduction;

(2) The Governor in Council may refer to the Court for hearing and consideration important questions of law or fact concerning any matter, whether or not in the opinion of the Court ejusdem generis with the enumerations contained in subsection (1), with reference to which the Governor in Council sees fit to submit any such question (3) Any question concerning any of the matters mentioned in subsections (1) and (2), and referred to the Court by the Governor in Council, shall be conclusively deemed to be an important question (4) Where a reference is made to the Court under subsection (1) or (2), it is the duty of the Court to hear and consider it and to answer each question so referred, and the Court shall certify to the Governor in Council, ...[+++] for his information, its opinion on each question, with the reasons for each answer, and the opinion shall be pronounced in like manner as in the case of a judgment on an appeal to the Court, and any judges who differ from the opinion of the majority shall in like manner certify their opinions and their reasons (5) Where the question relates to the constitutional validity of any Act passed by the legislature of any province, or of any provision in any such Act, or in case, for any reason, the government of any province has any special interest in any such question, the attorney general of the province shall be notified of the hearing in order that the attorney general may be heard if he thinks fit (6) The Court has power to direct that any person interested or, where there is a class of persons interested, any one or more persons as representatives of that class shall be notified of the hearing on any reference under this section, and those persons are entitled to be heard thereon.

It cannot be accepted that any decision of the administration, whether explicit or implied, containing either an inadequate statement of reasons or no statement of reasons (and thus necessitating a substantive examination) would be liable at any moment to become the subject of a request for an additional statement of reasons enabling officials or staff members to set themselves a new time-limit for lodging a complaint by claiming that they have three months from the receipt of that ...[+++] additional statement of reasons to lodge that complaint, even though the fact that a decision as referred to in Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations contains an inadequate statement of reasons may — indeed must — be raised specifically in a complaint and thus be duly rectified, where necessary, by the administration in the decision ruling on that complaint.