Traduction de «freely without any denial » (Anglais → Français) :

It applies to Iceland and Norway since it constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengenacquis (i.e. the existing EU laws on the Schengen area - an area in Europe without internal borders in which citizens, many non-EU nationals and tourists can freely move without border checks), as well as to Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

It applies to Iceland and Norway since it constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengenacquis (i.e. the existing EU laws on the Schengen area - an area in Europe without internal borders in which citizens, many non-EU nationals and tourists can freely move without border checks), as well as to Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

This present Commission proposal does not itself grant the right to move freely without a visa for short periods within the EU - without which it is in fact inoperable for most third country nationals - since this is covered by a separate proposal based on Articles 62(3) and 63(3).

If the farmer decides, for example as a result of the conditions of the market or for structural reasons, to abandon the growing and harvesting of hops, he can freely decide to do so without being without income.

Member States shall guarantee the political and economic independence of national regulatory authorities by ensuring that national regulatory authorities are legally distinct from and functionally independent of all organisations providing electronic communications networks, equipment or services. Member States that retain ownership or control of undertakings providing electronic communications networks and/or services shall ensure full and effective structural separation of the regulatory function from activities associated with ownership and control. They shall also ensure that any body carrying out regulatory functions is able to act freely, without ...[+++] the further authorisation of any other agency or body, subject only to the right of appeal pursuant to Article 4.

The study showed that the system of cultural heritage protection in each country consisted of a core of national treasures which could not permanently leave the national territory, a second category comprising cultural objects that required national authorisation in order to be transferred abroad and a third category consisting of all the objects which could move freely without controls because of their relative lack of importance in cultural terms.