Traduction de «future environmental expenditure » (Anglais → Français) :

environmental cost [ environmental expenditure | environmental expense ]

government environmental expenditure

Market Survey of Environmental Expenditure by Canadian Business

environmental cost [ environmental appraisal cost | environmental prevention cost | environmental protection cost | environmental protection expenditure | EPE ]

(Return tabled) Question No. 1290 Ms. Megan Leslie: With regard to federal tax expenditures from 2006-2012: (a) what is the government’s estimate of the annual forgone revenue for the sectors of oil and gas, mining, and where applicable, clean energy, attributed to the following federal tax expenditures, (i) accelerated capital cost allowance for oil sands, (ii) transitional arrangement for the Alberta royalty tax credit, (iii) reclassification of expenses under flow-through shares, (iv) flow-through share deductions, (v) earned depletion, (vi) net impact of resource allowance, (vii) deductibility of contributions to a q ...[+++]ualifying environmental trust, (viii) accelerated capital cost allowance for mining, (ix) canadian exploration expense, (x) canadian development expense for oil sands resource properties; and (b) if the Department of Finance is unable to provide estimates for any of the above tax expenditures, (i) what is the reason for the data gap, (ii) what steps does the Department of Finance plans on taking in future years to close the data gap?

– (FR) I voted against the Auken report as I believe we cannot compromise future financial prospects by determining the expenditure for a single area of environmental policy in advance.

As the meeting agenda was fairly extensive, the first part focused on the main challenges facing Europe in an uncertain climate. As mentioned by group president Mario Sepi in the introduction to his speech, this uncertainty results from unfamiliarity with the new Commission's programme, an unpredictable ratification process for the Constitutional Treaty and even the degeneration of industrial relations in many countries, caused by employers' erosion of workers' entitlements, often with the complicity of the State. Mr Sepi emphasised that these aspects were interlinked, because "the choices made for relaunching the Lisbon Strategy will certainly have an impact on the way Europe is seen by the millions of citizens called to vote on the consti ...[+++]tution". Mr Sepi concluded his speech by recalling the three main priorities for the future of Europe and its model: the mid-term review of the Lisbon Strategy "striking a balance with each side of its equilateral triangle, that is, the economic, social and environmental aspects"; the Stability and Growth Pact, "which must be reviewed not only in terms of economic flexibility but also in terms of quality of expenditure"; the EU's financial perspectives, which must (as G. Dassis' opinion made clear) take account of the cohesion objectives if we are to determine the financial resources needed to realise our ambitions.

When environmental expenditures are intended for use on a continuing basis for the purpose of the undertaking's activities, they should be capitalised, provided that they relate either to anticipated environmental benefits or to reduction or prevention of environmental contamination that is likely to occur as a result of future operations.