Traduction de «goal-directed process » (Anglais → Français) :

(Return tabled) Question No. 333 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to the government’s consultations about prostitution-related offences: (a) what goals have been established for the consultations; (b) what goals have been established for the online consultation; (c) whose input did the government seek through online consultation; (d) which individuals wrote the discussion paper for the online consultation; (e) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences participated in the development of the discussion paper in (d); (f) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences reviewed the discussion paper in (d); (g) which individuals with legal expertise participated in the development of the discussion p ...[+++]aper in (d); (h) which individuals with legal expertise reviewed the discussion paper in (d); (i) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics participated in the development of the discussion paper in (d); (j) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics reviewed the discussion paper in (d); (k) which individuals developed the online consultation questions; (l) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences participated in the development of the online consultation questions; (m) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences reviewed the online consultation questions; (n) which individuals with legal expertise participated in the development of the online consultation questions; (o) which individuals with legal expertise reviewed the online consultation questions; (p) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics participated in the development of the online consultation questions; (q) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics reviewed the online consultation questions; (r) how many responses did the government receive through the online form; (s) how many responses were sent directly to ...

36. Welcomes the direct political dialogue that the Government of Turkey has recently opened with Abdullah Öcalan; deems that a perspective for negotiations has been opened which could lead to a historic agreement that would settle the Kurdish conflict in a peaceful and democratic way; encourages the conflict parties, therefore, to transform these talks into structured negotiations as soon as possible; underlines the constructive role that all political parties, media and civil society in Turkey must play if the peace process is to succeed, and praises the cross-party and civil-society support for this initiative; notes that Turkey h ...[+++]as continued to demonstrate resilience to the terrorist attacks by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK); considers that true and sincere political dialogue is necessary, and calls on Turkey to invest renewed efforts in working towards a political solution to the Kurdish issue; asks all political forces to ensure an appropriate political platform for, and to debate in a constructive way, the Kurdish issue, and to facilitate a real opening to the claims for basic rights in the constitutional process that reflects the pluralism in Turkey and in which all citizens can find themselves and their rights fully recognised; asks all political forces to work in alliance towards the goal of reinforced political dialogue and a process of further political, cultural and socio-economic inclusion and participation of citizens of Kurdish origin, in order to guarantee their rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly, and to promote the peaceful inclusion of citizens of Kurdish origin in Turkish society; welcomes the new legislation that opens the possibility for people’s native language to be used in trials and the positive discussion on the use of Kurdish in education; recalls that a political solution can be built only on a truly democratic debate on the Kurdish issue, and expresses concern at the large number of cases launched aga ...

A number of amendments proposed in Bill C-2 aim at reducing duplication of processes and speak directly to this worthwhile goal.

to pursue actions on a Community scale as well as on a global scale, taking into account the existing international legal framework as well as international trade rules, and the adoption of appropriate legal instruments, to address residual uses of mercury in the Community, for example in dental amalgam and vaccines, to develop viable techniques for a further reduction of mercury emissions from the combustion of fuels and to replace the use of mercury in gold mining, to address the safe storage or disposal of mercury from the chlor-alkali industry, to implement best available techniques inter alia in line with the IPPC Directive, for further reduction of mercury emissions from combustion process ...[+++]es, to share with actors inside and outside the Community the common vision of the strategy, its principles, goals and related objectives and to actively participate in its further development and to share the responsibility for its implementation, taking also voluntary initiatives from industry into account, to ensure transparency and openness that has characterised the process up until now, to recognise the importance of public awareness, communication and education for the further implementation of the strategy, to achieve ownership and long-term political commitment by all stakeholders for the goals and objectives of the strategy, to address priorities on mercury research and technology, to support countries with economies in transition and developing countries with a high dependency on solid fuels, like coal, in promoting the clean and efficient use of fuels;

that non-EU countries bordering the regional European seas share the common vision of the strategy, its principles, goals and related objectives and do actively participate in its further development and share the responsibility for its implementation, to use to the extent possible, the work and the results of implementing existing EU legislation e.g. the Water framework Directive, the Habitat Directive etc, that the appropriate way forward for the development and implementation of the Strategy is a process of transparency and openness that has characterised the process up until now, to recognise and use public awareness, communication a ...[+++]nd education as important elements in the development and implementation of the Strategy, to achieve ownership and long term political commitment for the goals and objectives of the Strategy, to set priorities to give due regard to the necessary resources;

I wish to comment on all three of these problems and introduce three areas of concern that may be, in themselves, of equal merit in what I regard as a continuing process of national discussion over the goals and the future direction of our post-secondary institutions.