Traduction de «impact reactor » (Anglais → Français) :

impact mill | impact reactor | centrifugal impact mill

plug-flow reactor | PFR | plug flow reactor | longitudinal flow reactor | longitudinal reactor | nonbackmix flow reactor | piston flow reactor | slug flow reactor | tubular flow reactor

nuclear reactor [ atomic power cell | boiling water reactor | fast neutron reactor | fusion reactor | gas-cooled reactor | light-water reactor | power reactor | pressurised water reactor | thermal reactor | thermonuclear reactor | water-moderated reactor | water reactor ]

graphite-moderated gas-cooled reactor [ graphite moderated gas cooled reactor | gas-cooled graphite moderated power reactor | graphite-gas reactor | gas cooled graphite moderated reactor | gas-cooled-graphite-moderated power reactor ]

reactor type | type | reactor family | version | system | line | light water reactor | heavy water reactor | gas-cooled graphite-moderated power reactor

impact of information technology [ impact of ICT | impact of informatics | impact of information and communication technologies | impact of the digital revolution ]

environmental impact [ eco-balance | ecological assessment | ecological balance sheet | effect on the environment | environmental assessment | environmental effect | environmental footprint | Environmental assessment(ECLAS) | environmental assessment(GEMET) | environmental damage(GEMET) | environmental impact statement(GEMET) | environmental impact study(GEMET) | Environmental sustainability(STW) | environmental impact assessment(UNBIS) ]

environmental impact report | environmental impact statement | impact analysis | impact study

VVER reactor | water-cooled water-moderated power reactor | water-cooled, water-moderated energy reactor | WWER | WWER type reactor | VVER [Abbr.]

Applicant countries, some of which have undertaken to shut down their nuclear reactors that are not particularly safe, [34] take a mixed view of the alternatives to nuclear energy because of the impact on their economies.

(Return tabled) Question No. 465 Ms. Elizabeth May: With regard to the Nuclear Liability and Compensation Act enacted as part of Bill C-22, with particular reference to the government's decision to increase the absolute liability amount and mandatory insurance coverage for nuclear operators to $1 billion: (a) has the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) asked Ontario Power Generation whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage required under the Act at $1 billion, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, including the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (b) has the DNR asked Bruce Power whether removing the ca ...[+++]p on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage required under the Act at $1 billion, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, including the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (c) has the DNR asked New Brunswick Power whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, including the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (d) in the scenario in which the limit on reactor liability is removed while the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator remain at $1 billion, what is the DNR's estimate of the impacts that removing the cap on liability would have on provincial electricity rates, (i) what additional impacts would there be if the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator were increased to $1.5 billion, all other things being equal, (ii) what would the additional impacts be if the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator were increased to $2 billion, all other things being equal; (e) does ...

- Percentage of funded projects likely to have a demonstrable impact in the field of reactor time extension or in the design of new reactors types.

- Percentage of funded projects likely to have a demonstrable impact in the field of reactor time extension or in the design of new reactors types.