Traduction de «job processing control » (Anglais → Français) :

job control [ job processing control | job monitoring | job scheduling ]

work performance monitoring [ job performance control | performance control | job performance monitoring | performance monitoring | work performance control ]

process-control system [ process control system | process control computer system ]

carry out process control in the wearing apparel industry | process control | perform process control | perform process control in the wearing apparel industry

execute automated process control | operate an automated process control | operate automated process control | operate automated process controls

job-flow control

job definition control card

backup file | job-recovery control file

panel controller | process control room operator | gas processing control room supervisor | gas processing plant control room operator

process control | statistical process control

5. Notes that, while deficits have been reduced in a number of countries, this process has also caused a fall in public investment in the Union; welcomes therefore the fostering of a European investment policy aimed at boosting growth and job creation, and calls for further efforts to ensure the financing of the real economy; takes the view that the main aims of projects receiving EFSI support should be decent job creation leading to quality employment and achieving social, economic and territorial cohesion; considers that there should be stronger measures in response to Parliament’s call to promote social investment not only in pursu ...[+++]it of financial profit, but also with the aim of promoting a positive social impact and reducing inequality by, inter alia, improving public services and supporting the creation of jobs for categories of disadvantaged people; stresses, in this regard, the need to strengthen the Commission’s regulatory tools (such as impact assessments, evaluations, etc.) and to implement forms of control and monitoring where investments are made;

21. Recalls the Commission’s commitment to use all available tools, including the EU budget, to drive jobs and growth through smart investment in closer partnership with the Member States, national parliaments, regions and cities in order to bring about better implementation of existing policies and improve the effectiveness of action on the ground, specifically in the use of the European Structural and Investment Funds; stresses that the cohesion policy, in accordance with the economic governance process, remains the main source of ...[+++]such public investment, and therefore takes the view that synergies between the EFSI and other funds, especially the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), should be used; calls for synergies to be explored between ESIF and Horizon 2020; urges the crucial involvement of private partners and private investors in order to make the EFSI a success and highlights its job creation potential; calls, at the same time, for EU-level democratic control of the EFSI; takes the view that any funding diverted from Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility should result in an equal or greater amount of investment in research and innovation, digital infrastructure, transport and energy, respectively, and invites the Commission to seize the opportunity afforded by the mandatory 2016 review exercise to prepare compensation for these two programmes;

21. Recalls the Commission’s commitment to use all available tools, including the EU budget, to drive jobs and growth through smart investment in closer partnership with the Member States, national parliaments, regions and cities in order to bring about better implementation of existing policies and improve the effectiveness of action on the ground, specifically in the use of the European Structural and Investment Funds; stresses that the cohesion policy, in accordance with the economic governance process, remains the main source of ...[+++]such public investment, and therefore takes the view that synergies between the EFSI and other funds, especially the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), should be used; calls for synergies to be explored between ESIF and Horizon 2020; urges the crucial involvement of private partners and private investors in order to make the EFSI a success and highlights its job creation potential; calls, at the same time, for EU-level democratic control of the EFSI; takes the view that any funding diverted from Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility should result in an equal or greater amount of investment in research and innovation, digital infrastructure, transport and energy, respectively, and invites the Commission to seize the opportunity afforded by the mandatory 2016 review exercise to prepare compensation for these two programmes;

21. Recalls the Commission’s commitment to use all available tools, including the EU budget, to drive jobs and growth through smart investment in closer partnership with the Member States, national parliaments, regions and cities in order to bring about better implementation of existing policies and improve the effectiveness of action on the ground, specifically in the use of the European Structural and Investment Funds; stresses that the cohesion policy, in accordance with the economic governance process, remains the main source of ...[+++]such public investment, and therefore takes the view that synergies between the EFSI and other funds, especially the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), should be used; calls for synergies to be explored between ESIF and Horizon 2020; urges the crucial involvement of private partners and private investors in order to make the EFSI a success and highlights its job creation potential; calls, at the same time, for EU-level democratic control of the EFSI; takes the view that any funding diverted from Horizon 2020 and the Connecting Europe Facility should result in an equal or greater amount of investment in research and innovation, digital infrastructure, transport and energy, respectively, and invites the Commission to seize the opportunity afforded by the mandatory 2016 review exercise to prepare compensation for these two programmes;