Traduction de «no-cost risk reversal » (Anglais → Français) :

14. To point out that global challenges remain and are expected to increase, and that climate change and environmental degradation threaten to reverse the progress made in achieving the MDGs; to point out also that particular attention needs to be directed towards climate change mitigation and adaptation and towards disaster risk reduction and resilience, with the focus being on the poorest and most marginalised people in the post-2015 agenda; to stress that investing in disaster risk reduction measures in advance of disasters is fa ...[+++]r more cost-effective than funding disaster response;

2. The Member States may set different frequencies of inspections depending on the type and effective rated output of the air-conditioning system, the ventilation system or reversible heat pumps. When setting the frequencies Member States shall take into account the costs of the inspection and the estimated energy cost savings that may result from the inspection.

(c)the rate of increase and the reversibility of the trend are such that a later starting point for trend reversal measures would still enable such measures to prevent most cost-effectively, or at least mitigate as far as possible, any environmentally significant detrimental changes in groundwater quality.

the rate of increase and the reversibility of the trend are such that a later starting point for trend reversal measures would still enable such measures to prevent most cost-effectively, or at least mitigate as far as possible, any environmentally significant detrimental changes in groundwater quality.

18. Observes that many caesarean operations currently performed are not necessarily required on medical grounds and that as a result more caesareans are being performed upon demand at a time scheduled in advance, although considerable risk to mother and child is associated with such operations; observes likewise that the rising number of caesareans is costly to national health services; calls on the Member States therefore explicitly to draw attention to the disadvantages and risks associated with caesareans during preparations for birth and to have caesareans performed only when they are medically necessary; instructs the Commission ...[+++]furthermore to study this subject in order to ascertain the causes of the growing prevalence of caesareans;

A reverse burden of proof is not what we now have in the outcome achieved but, instead, restrictions that apply only if, by means of a risk assessment, it can be demonstrated that a risk exists. In other words, we have precisely the policy that all the institutions have recognised as being ineffective in protecting people’s health.