Traduction de «phase comparator » (Anglais → Français) :

86. Notes the overall level of EUR 748 million (i.e. 0.5 % of the total EU budget) devoted to the decentralised EU agencies in DB 2013, resulting in an increase in the total EU contribution (including assigned revenue) as compared to the 2012 budget amounting to EUR 24 million, or +3.2 %; is aware that this increase is accounted for mainly by the eight phasing-in agencies, in view of the need to provide them with adequate funding, and by the seven agencies whose tasks have been extended, so as not to hinder their performance; notes that the EU contribution to the agencies at cruising speed is decreasing in nominal terms, with, however, ...[+++] an increase in staffing of 1.2 %; notes that the agencies now have a total of 5 115 establishment plan posts overall, i.e. an increase of 257 posts, mainly concerning agencies with new tasks or in their start-up phase;

87. Notes the overall level of EUR 748 million (i.e. 0,5 % of the total EU budget) devoted to the decentralised EU agencies in DB 2013, resulting in an increase in the total EU contribution (including assigned revenue) as compared to the 2012 budget amounting to EUR 24 million, or +3,2 %; is aware that this increase is accounted for mainly by the eight phasing-in agencies, in view of the need to provide them with adequate funding, and by the seven agencies whose tasks have been extended, so as not to hinder their performance; notes that the EU contribution to the agencies at cruising speed is decreasing in nominal terms, with, however, ...[+++] an increase in staffing of 1,2 %; notes that the agencies now have a total of 5 115 establishment plan posts overall, i.e. an increase of 257 posts, mainly concerning agencies with new tasks or in their start-up phase;

27. Stresses that the TEN-T programme, through investment in high European added value infrastructures, has a central role to play in the attainment of the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy; considers this programme to be essential for boosting the competitiveness of the EU as a whole, by creating the missing infrastructure and removing bottlenecks within the internal market; stresses that infrastructure projects also directly contribute to growth by stimulating employment during the building phase; underlines the role of the TEN-T programme for meeting the goals of adaptation to climate change by ensuring the future sustainabili ...[+++]ty of the EU’s transport networks; welcomes the Commission's proposed increase of approximately EUR 85 million compared to the 2012 budget, but asks for further clarification on the proposed reduction by EUR 118 million as compared to the financial programming; recalls that the main TEN-T programme was fully executed in 2011, and points out that a final judgement on how commitments have been implemented and paid out on projects in the 2007-2013 financial framework can only be made in 2017;

26. Stresses that the TEN-T programme, through investment in high European added value infrastructures, has a central role to play in the attainment of the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy; considers this programme to be essential for boosting the competitiveness of the EU as a whole, by creating the missing infrastructure and removing bottlenecks within the internal market; stresses that infrastructure projects also directly contribute to growth by stimulating employment during the building phase; underlines the role of the TEN-T programme for meeting the goals of adaptation to climate change by ensuring the future sustainabili ...[+++]ty of the EU’s transport networks; welcomes the Commission's proposed increase of approximately EUR 85 million compared to the 2012 budget, but asks for further clarification on the proposed reduction by EUR 118 million as compared to the financial programming; recalls that the main TEN-T programme was fully executed in 2011, and points out that a final judgement on how commitments have been implemented and paid out on projects in the 2007-2013 financial framework can only be made in 2017;

310. Regrets that, according to the Courts‘ findings, the management of the development and validation phase of the Galileo programme was inadequate; notes that the technological development has been set back five years compared to the initial planning and that the cost estimates for the development and validation phase have almost doubled from EUR 1 100 000 000 to EUR 2 100 000 000;

The evaluator carried out a comparative analysis which shows that the CARDS and the Tacis countries are now in a situation which is similar to that prevailing during previous phases of the Tempus programme.