Traduction de «post-determination review » (Anglais → Français) :

Currently if someone is refused refugee status they do have the right to seek a post-determination review, which is done by the Department of Immigration.

2a. Within three years after the date referred to in Article 20, the necessity and appropriateness of the elements enumerated in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article shall be reviewed in the light of defining possible new elements which shall be taken into account in order to determine whether the undertaking is genuine and a posted worker temporarily carries out his or her work, with a view to proposing, where appropriate, any necessary amendments or modifications.

2a. Within three years after .*, the necessity and appropriateness of the elements referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall be reviewed in the light of defining possible new elements to be taken into account in order to determine whether the undertaking is genuine and a posted worker temporarily carries out his or her work, and, where appropriate, a proposal shall be submitted to the European Parliament and to the Council for any necessary amendments.

29. Rejects the draft memorandum of understanding in which a code of practice for the exchange of information between OLAF and the Commission is set out, because it impinges upon the Regulation currently in force and, therefore, on OLAF's remit; believes that the provisions governing the forwarding of information should perhaps be reviewed in the context of a revised regulation; insists that the notification of OLAF should be enshrined in the Statute pursuant to Article 2 of the standard decision; insists that the head of OLAF should determine the content of the information, taking as criteria the protection of the rights of the perso ...[+++]n concerned, the need for an effective and efficient investigation to be carried out and the need for the EU institutions to be protected against any financial loss in future; calls on the Commission and OLAF to check whether it would be worthwhile to create the post of a legal officer; considers that each EU institution should lay down rules governing the way in which it deals with information received from OLAF, ensuring that it respects these criteria;

28. Rejects the draft memorandum of understanding in which a code of practice for the exchange of information between OLAF and the Commission is set out, because it infringes upon the Regulation currently in force and, therefore, on OLAF's remit; believes that the provisions governing the forwarding of information should perhaps be reviewed in the context of a revised regulation; insists that the notification of OLAF should be enshrined in the Statute pursuant to Article 2 of the standard decision; insists that the head of OLAF should determine the content of the information, taking as criteria the protection of the rights of the pers ...[+++]on concerned, the need for an effective and efficient investigation to be carried out, and the need for the EU institutions to be protected against any financial loss in future; calls on the Commission and OLAF to check whether it would be worthwhile to create the post of a legal officer; considers that each EU institution should lay down rules governing the way in which it deals with information received from OLAF, ensuring that it respects these criteria;

21. Calls on the Commission to establish an Audit Commission in which the analyses, assessments and proposals made on the basis of the ex post internal audit may be reviewed and the implementation thereof determined;