Traduction de «private companies promoting » (Anglais → Français) :

limited company | private company limited by shares | private limited company | private limited liability company

advertise the company | promoting the company | promote club activities | promote company

closed company | family company | private company | private limited liability company

private company with limited liability | private limited liability company

private company [ private corporation | close company | close corporation | closed company | closed corporation | privately held corporation | closely held corporation | closely-held corporation ]

private company | private corporation | privately-held company | privately-held corporation | closed corporation | close corporation | privately owned corporation | privately-controlled corporation

French Association of Private Companies

exempt private company

be a company ambassador | promote and explain company services to customers | act as a company ambassador | act as an ambassador for the company

maintenance of relationships with stakeholders | stakeholder relationship maintenance | maintain relationships with stakeholders | promote company values

The EIB funds will be used to finance projects promoted by SMEs (with up to 250 employees), mid-cap companies (with up to 3 000 employees) and public-sector entities, as well as other types of private-sector promoters in Romania.

For instance, in France, there have been extremely good practices from private companies promoting in-house training in their companies and promoting apprenticeships with public money, but with part of it also funded by the companies themselves.

(Return tabled) Question No. 482 Mr. Glenn Thibeault: With regard to Infrastructure Canada's programs: (a) under the Public Transit Fund (PTF), how much funding was committed for each province and how much funding was spent to date under the PTF; (b) under the Canadian Strategic Infrastructure Fund, (i) to date, what applications for projects have been approved for funding, (ii) for each project, who are the partners involved and what is each partner’s contribution, including the government’s contribution, (iii) for each project, how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (iv) for each project, what was the economic benefit, (v) fo ...[+++]r each project, what is the anticipated completion date, (vi) what criteria were used to determine which projects were approved; (c) under the Border Infrastructure Fund, (i) to date, by province, what applications for projects have been approved for funding, (ii) for each project, who are the partners involved and what is each partner’s contribution, including the government’s contribution, (iii) for each project, how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (iv) for each project, what was the economic benefit, (v) for each project, what is the anticipated completion date, (vi) what criteria were used to determine which projects were approved; (d) under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF), (i) by province, how many municipalities submitted applications and how many projects were approved, (ii) for every fiscal year since the program was launched, up to and including the current fiscal year, how much funding has the MRIF disbursed and to whom, (iii) for each approved project, what was the municipality’s contribution; (iv) were consulting companies hired to support program delivery and, if so, what are their names; (e) under the Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP), (i) by province, how many applications were submitted, (ii) by province and riding, how many applications were approved, (iii) for every fiscal year since ...

15. Calls on the Commission to apply the principle of affirmative action in favour of SMEs, and to take steps to help to: create companies electronically; appropriately simplify the regulatory environment; promote SME access to finance during the first years of existence via Risk Capital or 'Business Angel' formulas: enhance the roles of the EIB and EIF; increase SME access to ITC, acknowledging that the gap in competitiveness between the EU and the USA is found not only in high-technology sectors but also in distribution channels ...[+++]and the retail sector; promote structures of cooperation and foster their internationalisation by adopting the proposed 14th company law directive on the cross-border transfer of limited companies’ registered offices and by discussing the added value of a future statute of a European private company for SMEs;