Traduction de «progress reporting option » (Anglais → Français) :

Make use of any relevant core indicators or methods of empirical social research or data collection for monitoring and evaluating progress on a regular basis, particularly at the local level, enabling efficient reporting on the situation of Roma in the Member States with the optional support of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.

After the abovementioned review, and in order to ensure the continuous monitoring of roaming services in the Union, the Commission should prepare a report to the European Parliament and the Council every two years which includes a general summary of the latest trends in roaming services and an intermediary assessment of the progress towards achieving the objectives of this Regulation and of the possible alternative options for achieving these objectives,

Progress towards a European contract law for consumers and businesses Report: Diana Wallis (A7-0164/2011) Report on policy options for progress towards a European Contract Law for consumers and businesses [COM(2010)0348 - - 2011/2013(INI)] Committee on Legal Affairs Rule 48(2)

11. while calling for progress in removing the other barriers identified in the Giovannini Group's report on Cross-Border Clearing and Settlement Arrangements in the European Union of November 2001, strongly reiterates the need to improve the post-trading infrastructure both with a view to price transparency and competition as to the public interest of clearing and settlement security; welcomes the progress being made in implementing the Code of Conduct which will deliver those aims and which will also support Article 34 of MiFID, requiring stock exchanges to provide all their users with the option of designating the settlement system in which they want to settle their transactions in the event of cross-border share transactions; intends ...[+++]closely to scrutinise the developments surrounding the Code of Conduct as well as the TARGET2 Securities project in this context, emphasising the governance and supervision needed to cope with conflicts of interest; and calls the Council and the Commission to launch, without further delay, the initiatives required to remove completely the obstacles under the control of the public sector relating to the legal and fiscal barriers identified in the Giovannini Group's report and in the areas not covered by the Code of Conduct.;

12. while calling for progress in removing the other barriers identified in the Giovannini Group's report on Cross-Border Clearing and Settlement Arrangements in the European Union of November 2001, strongly reiterates the need to improve the post-trading infrastructure both with a view to price transparency, and competition as to the public interest of clearing and settlement security; welcomes the progress being made in implementing the Code of Conduct which will deliver those aims and which will also support Article 34 of MiFID, requiring stock exchanges to provide all their users with the option of designating the settlement system with which they wish to settle their transactions in the event of cross-border share transactions; inten ...[+++]ds closely to scrutinise the developments surrounding the Code of Conduct as well as the TARGET2 Securities project in this context, emphasising the governance and supervision needed to cope with conflicts of interest; calls on the Council and the Commission to launch, without further delay, the initiatives required to remove completely the obstacles under the control of the public sector, relating to the legal and fiscal barriers identified in the Giovannini Group's report and in the areas not covered by the Code of Conduct;

15. Takes the view that coordinating activities in connection with practical cooperation on asylum-related matters must remain the task of the Commission, which must be provided with resources appropriate to that task; calls on the Commission to advocate that option in the report which it will submit in early 2008 concerning progress with the first phase of activities and, if it chooses another option, to justify why the establishment of a new structure in the form of a 'European Support Office' is considered necessary, whereas the cost-benefit ratio should be taken into account; takes the view that if the Commission envisages the creation of a European Support Office, it should be under a strict obligation to include guarantees of its tr ...[+++]ansparency and accountability;