Traduction de «resource allocation option » (Anglais → Français) :

agrees on the necessity to regularly update the selected information topics and the underpinning communication strategies in line with the information needs of citizens as identified, inter alia, in opinion polls and surveys; underlines, in the context of the “Future of Europe” priority topic, the need for Member States and Institutions to deploy major efforts to ensure that European citizens are well-informed about the future Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe; invites Member States and the Commission to implement special communication actions aimed at addressing the information needs of all schools students; considers tha ...[+++]t the objectives and content of campaigns on ”Enlargement” should be redefined and adapted in the light of the accession of the ten new Member States; stresses the need to put greater emphasis on the ”Area of Freedom, Security and Justice” by increasing budgetary allocations and by undertaking joint information initiatives on aspects of particular relevance to citizens like the fight against crime and terrorism; attaches great importance to the “Role of Europe in the World”, including the need to inform citizens on ESDP, especially in connection with the missions being carried out under that policy; calls for interested Member States and Institutions to consider co-ordinated activities in this regard in the forthcoming years; urges strongly that budgetary allocations and personnel resources for priority topics under the PRINCE programme should be consistent with the communication challenges ahead, at both institutional and local level; underlines the need to facilitate effective co-operation between Member States and the Commission's Representations in the Member States; recommends the future regrouping of the PRINCE budget in a single budget line in order to make the best use of available funds; shares the Commission's view that PRINCE should continue to be based on partnership between Commission and Member States; consider ...

However, this will mean a continued juggling of resources and activities (1535) [Translation] Mr. Chairman, the men and women in the Canadian Forces continue to carry the greatest share of the load. This gives Canada a number of options, but nevertheless, the necessary resources must be allocated in order to meet real anticipated costs.

The second aspect to this issue concerns the mobility of young researchers. You are aware that we have the Marie Curie programme, which is a success, but we would like to double the resources in the proposals allocated to assisting the mobility of young researchers, and also to create grants to attract researchers to Europe, so that Europe once again becomes an attractive option for the best researchers in the world including third countries.

(5) Member States are urged to consider a comprehensive overhaul of their systems and procedures for administrative cooperation and mutual assistance in the field of VAT in the light of its current shortcomings and to consider how to achieve its optional functioning, including the organisation of their CLOs; the allocation of resources and the removal of all internal barriers, legal as well as administrative which have any impact on a proper functioning of exchange of information.

(a) the natural resources of Canada are the property of all Canadians; (b) the needs and interests of Canadians should be considered first and foremost in the exploitation, development and use of Canada's natural resources; (c) the recommended Maritime and Northeast Pipeline proposal overwhelmingly favours American interests over the interests of Canadians by channelling 83% of the natural gas extracted from the Sable Offshore Energy Project to the United States, while a mere 17% will be allocated to only two Canadian provinces, Nova Scotia and southern New Brunswick; (d) the TransMaritime pipeline proposal places the interests of Canadians ...[+++] first by allocating 64% of the Sable Offshore natural gas to four Canadian provinces, including 34% to Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, as opposed to a total volume of only 36% to the United States; (e) the TransMaritime proposal allows the provinces of Ontario and Quebec to benefit from any natural gas from the Sable Offshore Energy Project; (f) the TransMaritime Pipeline proposal offers support for Canadian industry and security of energy supplies for central Canada, and offers more Canadians a greater supply of natural gas at a lower cost; (g) the TransMaritime Pipeline proposal generates employment opportunities and provides long-term benefits to disadvantaged northern New Brunswick; (h) the TransMaritime Pipeline proposal will unite Canada, since it sends a positive message of inclusion, security, opportunity, and sharing within the Confederation, to Canadians in four provinces, including Acadians, Quebecers and francophone Ontarians; (i) the refusal of the Sable Offshore Energy Project Joint Review Panel and the National Energy Board to hear the proposal submitted by TransMaritime Pipeline may seriously prejudice the rights of Canadians in the development and use of their energy resources and may undermine Canada's sovereignty over these resources; (j) a significant amount of time will not be saved in the development ...

That the Senate of Canada urge the Governor in Council not to give final approval to the project submitted by the consortium that proposed the Maritime and Northeast Pipeline Project until the Government of Canada has fulfilled its obligation to hold full and fair hearings on the proposals submitted by all interested parties, including the TransMaritime Pipeline Proposal, considering the following: (a) the natural resources of Canada are the property of all Canadians; (b) the needs and interests of Canadians should be considered first and foremost in the exploitation, development and use of Canada's natural resources; (c) the recommended Maritime and Northeast Pipeline proposal overwhelmingly favours American interests over the interests ...[+++]of Canadians by channelling 83% of the natural gas extracted from the Sable Offshore Energy Project to the United States, while a mere 17% will be allocated to only two Canadian provinces, Nova Scotia and southern New Brunswick; (d) the TransMaritime pipeline proposal places the interests of Canadians first by allocating 64% of the Sable Offshore natural gas to four Canadian provinces, including 34% to Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, as opposed to a total volume of only 36% to the United States; (e) the TransMaritime proposal allows the provinces of Ontario and Quebec to benefit from any natural gas from the Sable Offshore Energy Project; (f) the TransMaritime Pipeline proposal offers support for Canadian industry and security of energy supplies for central Canada, and offers more Canadians a greater supply of natural gas at a lower cost; (g) the TransMaritime Pipeline proposal generates employment opportunities and provides long-term benefits to disadvantaged northern New Brunswick; (h) the TransMaritime Pipeline proposal will unite Canada, since it sends a positive message of inclusion, security, opportunity, and sharing within the Confederation, to Canadians in four provinces, including Acadians, Quebecers and francophone O ...