Traduction de «side impact protection system » (Anglais → Français) :

Upper Legform to Frontal Protection System. The test is performed at an impact speed of 40 km/h. The instantaneous sum of the impact forces with respect to time shall not exceed 7,5 kN and the bending moment on the test impactor shall not exceed 510 Nm.

The report highlights the major impact the system has had on the protection of the environment as exhaust emissions have been reduced by more than 55% compared with the 1991 level.

Renault, for example, having made extra airbags standard on every model, paid for the Megane to be re-tested to demonstrate its improved side-impact protection.

1.1. Pursuant to Article 3 (4) of Directive 70/156/EEC applications for EC type-approval of a vehicle type with regard to the protection of occupants of motor vehicles in the event of a side-impact protection must be submitted by the manufacturer.

Annex There have been a number of important developments since the 1994 communication:[3] - The Task Force on the "Car of tomorrow" has started its work. - The block exemption Regulation for the distribution of motor vehicles has been renewed. - Industrial cooperation agreements have been concluded with China and India. - The Korean and Japanese markets have been further opened to European imports. - Contacts between European suppliers and Japanese manufacturers have been enhanced at the JAMA-CLEPA business conference with the support of the European Union. - The regulatory work on type-approval, mandatory for all new types of passenger cars from 1996, has been completed. - The results of the Auto-Oil Programme, which is based on air qualit ...[+++]y targets for major European cities and a detailed cost-benefit assessment, have been published and used as a basis for new Commission proposals to reduce passenger car emissions. - New safety and environmental initiatives have been taken (e.g. front and side impact protection, safety belts in coaches). - A training network has been set up with funding from the FORCE programme, resulting in 53 proposals for specific, innovative training projects.

The assistant deputy minister of the Health Protection Branch testified at the Commons committee that these decisions strengthened the science base of Canada's health protection system; that the decisions were based on peer review, with an impact assessment; that research involving the detection of harmful food additives, deadly bacteria in seafood, and dangerous drugs represents, to quote the ADM, “cuts to basic science”, not sa ...[+++]fety research.