Traduction de «subscriber line group » (Anglais → Français) :

symmetric digital subscriber line [ SDSL | symmetrical digital subscriber line | single-line digital subscriber line | single-line DSL | single pair digital subscriber line ]

very high bit-rate digital subscriber line [ VDSL | very high-bit-rate DSL | very high-bit-rate digital/subscriber line | very-high data-rate digital subscriber line | very high bit rate data subscriber line ]

high bit rate digital subscriber line [ HDSL | high bit-rate digital subscriber line | high-speed digital subscriber line | highspeed digital subscriber line ]

high-bit-rate digital subscriber line | HDSL | high-bit-rate digital subscriber loop | high-bit-rate DSL | high-speed digital subscriber line | high-data-rate digital subscriber line

very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber line | VDSL | VHDSL | very-high-bit-rate digital subscriber loop | very-high-bit-rate DSL | very-high-speed digital subscriber line | very-high-speed DSL | very-high-data-rate digital subscriber line

asymmetric digital subscriber line | ADSL | asymmetrical digital subscriber line | asymmetric digital subscriber loop | asynchronous digital subscriber line

symmetric digital subscriber line | synchronous high-rate digital subscriber line | SDSL [Abbr.]

line interface | line interface module | line module | subscriber line unit

asymmetric digital subscriber line | asymmetrical digital subscriber loop | ADSL [Abbr.]

access line | local line | subscriber line

These so called “blackspot” areas are localities where broadband services are not available and that are not considered by current market players as commercially feasible in the near future. They include the thirty five telecommunications exchange areas not figuring on BT Group’s roll-out program, as well as communities that are disadvantaged for technological or topological reasons, e.g. they are located too far from an asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL)-enabled telecommunications exchange.

I wish to highlight two points from the proposal: the first is the refusal by the majority of Members of this House to reduce appropriations for supporting the running of European parties and parliamentary groups, a move which I supported; the second is the maintenance of the specific budget line for financial assistance for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of East Timor, and the significant increase in this sum compared to the previous year, a decision that the European Parliament passed with an extremely large majority, fleshi ...[+++]ng out the proposal for an amendment tabled in the Committee on Budgets, to which I also subscribed.

‘Fixed price systems shall provide for discounts for certain user groups, for example libraries, bookshops, educational establishments or subscribers’, to ensure that private educational institutions are also able to take advantage of discounts in line with the objective of lifelong learning.

It is true that Council Directive 92/44/EEC of 5 June 1992 on the application of open network provision to leased lines, amended by Commission Decision 94/439/EC (8), harmonizes the basic principles regarding the provision of leased lines, but it only harmonizes the conditions of access and use of leased lines. The aim of that Directive is not to remedy the conflict of interest of the telecommunications organizations as infrastructure and service providers. It does not impose a structural separation between the telecommunications organizations as providers of leased lines and as service providers. Complaints illustrate that even in Membe ...[+++]r States which have implemented that Directive, telecommunications organizations still use their control of the access conditions to the network at the expense of their competitors in the services market. Complaints show that telecommunications organizations still apply excessive tariffs and that they use information acquired as infrastructure providers regarding the services planned by their competitors, to target clients in the services market. Directive 92/44/EEC only provides for the principle of cost-orientation and does not prevent telecommunications organizations to use the information acquired as capacity provider as regards subscribers' usage patterns, necessary to target specific groups of users, and on price elasticities of demand in each service market segment and region of the country. The current regulatory framework does not resolve the conflict of interest mentioned above. The most appropriate remedy to this conflict of interest is therefore to allow service providers to use own or third party telecommunications infrastructure to provide their services to the final customers instead of the infrastructure of their main competitor. In its resolution of 22 December 1994 the Council also approved the principle that infrastructure provision should be liberalized.