Traduction de «the front five » (Anglais → Français) :

the powerhouse | the front five

A very rare congenital malformation of the digits with the absence of the middle phalanges (usually of digits two to five), nail dysplasia and duplicated terminal phalanx of the thumb. Has been described in patients from two unrelated families.

Islamic Front for Jihad against Crusaders and Jews | World Front for Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders | World Islamic Front | World Islamic Front for Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders | World Islamic Front for the struggle against the Jews and the Crusaders

The association of four anomalies: intellectual deficit, microcephaly, palate anomalies and ocular abnormalities. It has been described in five patients (three boys and two girls). The clinical manifestations are evident from birth. The palate anomal

Pyknoachondrogenesis is a lethal skeletal osteochondrodysplasia characterised by severe generalised osteosclerosis. The disease is very rare and only five cases (four males and one female) have been reported in the literature so far. Pyknoachondrogen

Definition: Starts in the first five years of life and is characterized by persistent abnormalities in the child's pattern of social relationships that are associated with emotional disturbance and are reactive to changes in environmental circumstances (e.g. fearfulness and hypervigilance, poor social interaction with peers, aggression towards self and others, misery, and growth failure in some cases). The syndrome probably occurs as a direct result of severe parental neglect, abuse, or serious mishandling.

Joint Technical Commission for the Argentina/Uruguay Maritime Front | Joint Technical Commission of the Marine Front | Joint Technical Commission of the Maritime Front | CTMFM [Abbr.] | JTCMF [Abbr.]

Uniform provisions concerning the approval of Front underrun protective devices (FUPDs) | Uniform provisions concerning the approval of Vehicles with regard to the installation of an FUPD of an approved type | Uniform provisions concerning the approval of Vehicles with regard to their front underrun protection (FUP)

Federal Act of 30 March 1911 on the Amendment of the Swiss Civil Code (Part Five: Code of Obligations) | Swiss Code of Obligations [ CO ]

COMMENCING at the Southwesterly angle of Lot Forty-four (44); THENCE, Northerly along the West limit of the said Lot, a distance of seventy-five and sixty-five one-hundreths feet (75.65′), more or less, to the Southeasterly boundary of Lot Thirty-seven (37), as shown on Plan 722; THENCE, Northeasterly along the Southeasterly boundary of Lot Thirty-seven (37), a distance of ninety-one and thirty-one one-hundredths feet (91.31′), more or less, to the Southerly limit of the lane as defined by the City of Fort William By-Law 1043; THENCE, Easterly along the said Southerly limit of the said lane, a distance of one hundred and eighty-seven feet (187′), more or less, to the Easterly boundary of the Westerly thirty-three feet (33′) throug ...[+++]hout from front to rear of the Easterly half of said Lot Forty-three (43); THENCE, Southerly along the said Easterly boundary, a distance of one hundred and fifty-five feet (155′), more or less, to the Southern boundary of Lot Forty-three (43); THENCE, Westerly along the Southern boundary of Lots Forty-three (43) and Forty-four (44) to the point of commencement.

2. A strip of land on the south side of the said Ste. Foye road, to be taken off the front or northerly end of lots numbers sixty-eight (68), seventy-five (75) and seventy-six (76) and seventy-nine (79) on the cadastral plan for the said Banlieue, parish of Notre Dame de Quebec, the said strip of land to be of such a depth as, when the same is added to the present width of the said Ste. Foye road, will make the said road seventy-five feet wide in that locality.

At the press conference after the bill’s introduction in the House of Commons on 10 April 2014, the then AFN National Chief, Shawn A-in-chut Atleo, indicated that he felt the legislation met the five conditions unanimously endorsed by the First Nations chiefs in December 2013, namely First Nations control, a statutory funding guarantee, the incorporation of language and culture into curriculum, no unilateral oversight by government, and meaningful engagement in the future.51 However, in its news release, the AFN did not expressly confirm this position, stating, “Each nation will need to determine for themselves if this bill meets their n ...[+++]eeds and our demand for an approach that places our children front and centre and is founded on our rights, Treaties and jurisdiction”.

(Return tabled) Question No. 65 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to the climate summit in Copenhagen and climate change: (a) what criteria needed to be met in order to be part of the Canadian delegation; (b) what were the name and position of each member of the Canadian delegation, what expertise and skills did each bring to the table, and for what time period were each in Copenhagen; (c) what was the total budget for the delegation, from flights to accommodation and living expenses; (d) what, if any, offsets were purchased for the ...[+++]delegation; (e) what was the description, in detail, of the Canadian climate change plan, and when will it be revealed to Canadians; (f) who were all the stakeholders consulted in the development of the plan, and how does each goal/target reflect or does not reflect each stakeholder's views; (g) did the government include the voice of Canadians who are on the “front line of climate change”, and were those who will be impacted by climate change meaningfully involved, and, if so, how; (h) what accountability measures, if any, were in place to ensure that the Canadian delegation would be responsible to those Canadians who will be particularly impacted (e.g., those living in low-lying areas and Aboriginal peoples); (i) what has been the stakeholder response to the plan, particularly from business, NGOs, scientists, and all stakeholders, and if available, what is the actual response of stakeholders' consulted; (j) what were the specific goals of the Canadian delegation, and how do they compare (in advance and afterward) with those of the G20 or OECD in terms of baseline, absolute reductions, and target date; (k) did the Canadian delegation support the notion that climate change is not just an environmental issue, but rather a human rights issue and a justice issue and, if so, what is the description, in detail, of Canada's position; (l) did the Canadian delegation listen to the world's “frontline voice”, such as Bangladesh's and the ...