Traduction de «two-headed approach » (Anglais → Français) :

This head in the sand approach has resulted in two referendums in succession, two failed constitutional accords and the growth of two full blown separatist parties in the Bloc Quebecois and Parti Quebecois.

Reflecting Cree aspirations to exercise broader governance powers, Chapter 3 of the 2008 Agreement describes a two-phased approach to governance. It involves (1) defining the CRA’s by-law-making authority through amendments to the CNQA, in order to enhance the Authority’s capacity to assume defined federal responsibilities under the JBNQA; and (2) describing a process for negotiations toward a Governance Agreement and related legislation, as well as possible consequential amendments to the JBNQA and the CNQA to establish “a Cree Nation Government with powers and authorities beyond the scope of the CNQA” (22) In acco ...[+++]rdance with the first phase, section 3.3 describes the numerous specific amendments agreed to by the parties, which are set out in Bill C-28 and reviewed under the Description and Analysis heading below.

The Commission also insists in its proposal on the two-pillar approach, despite being fully aware of two factors: firstly, modulation is no longer exclusively a formula for strengthening the second pillar, but is being turned into a means of cutting budgetary costs with a view to financing future sectoral reforms; and, secondly, in the wake of the agreement of October 2002 on stabilising agricultural expenditure, the second pillar is now condemned to under-funding despite not having (by contrast with heading 1b) managed to consolidate its allocation.

I should like to remind the House that with regard to asylum, the scoreboard that has been submitted reflects the conclusions at the Tampere Summit where a two-stage approach was adopted by the Heads of State and Government.

11. Takes the view, however, that the budgetary codecision procedure should differ in one respect from the legislative codecision procedure, in that, since the budget must be adopted in accordance with strict deadlines, the possibility of the ultimate rejection of the finance law as a result of a disagreement between the Council and Parliament cannot be countenanced; emphasises the need to simplify the annual budgetary procedure and make it more transparent, which might make it possible to concentrate the procedure over a shorter period; notes that a number of possible options could be explored with a view to overcoming any disagreement between the two arms of the budgetary authority; provision should, for example, be made either for a m ...[+++]echanism for the automatic entry in the budget of the appropriations required to cover the Union’s legislative and contractual commitments, or the award of a ‘final say’ to Parliament, on the basis of a strict maximum rate for the increase in expenditure, determined heading by heading, over the previous financial year; these two approaches could be combined;

Finally, I would just like to remind you that the Experts Committee hesitated for a long time between two possible approaches as a response to the question put by the Heads of State and Government.