Traduction de «value assurance » (Anglais → Français) :

value analysis [ value control | value assurance ]

archival value [ historical value | continuing value | enduring value | secondary value | long-term value | permanent value | indefinite value | lasting value | research value | evidential-archival value ]

exploitable value | exploitation value | liquidation value | realisation value | realization value | utilization value

gross calorific value [ GCV | high heating value | gross heating value | higher calorific value | gross energy value | higher heating value | upper heating value | gross specific energy | upper calorific value ]

value to the firm | deprival value | entity value | entity-specific value | opportunity value | retention value | value to the business

gross calorific value | gross heating value | high heat value | high heating value | higher heating value | GCV [Abbr.] | HHV [Abbr.]

low calorific value | low heat value | lower heating value | net calorific value | net heating value | net specific energy | LHV [Abbr.] | NCV [Abbr.]

value creation | creating value | generating value | process of creating value | process of generating value

company's value | enterprise's value | value of company culture | value of enterprise culture | entrepreneurial culture value

establish resale value of items | estimate resale value of items | determine resale value of items | determine value of used items

I know that a lot of the people who value health privacy, as we do, at one and the same time value as I am sure everyone around this table also values efforts to secure quality care and to measure the effectiveness of the health system, because without that we cannot even benefit the health of Canadians, let alone the system. However, we are not talking from the system's perspective; we are worried about individual health of Canadians which can only be assured by measuring outcomes in quality and by doing things based on information ...[+++]and evidence.

Question No. 15 Hon. Geoff Regan: With regard to the Standards Council of Canada (SCC): (a) does the SCC consider the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) a commercial entity or a regulatory entity; (b) does the SCC believe that CSA owns any portion of Canadian law; (c) does the SCC believe that the CSA is afforded an exemption, or exemptions, to Canadian law; (d) does the SCC believe that the CSA has the right to restrict public access to Canadian law; (e) what is the average annual value transferred from CSA to provincial governments in payment for those contributions; (f) what percentage of CSA members’ payments for Canadian Elec ...[+++]trical Code (CEC) influence are diverted to non-CEC activities; (g) does the SCC believe that the CSA practice of trading influence over, or control of, legislative processes in exchange for money or other value consideration is a violation of law; (h) does the SCC believe that the CSA practice of leveraging regulatory authority for commercial advantage is an abuse of regulatory authority; (i) what is the increase in annual revenue experienced by CSA, expressed both in percent and in Canadian dollars, resulting from this decision to tighten the Code development cycle by 25 percent; (j) what is the average annual value of royalty payments made to CSA by each of the government of British Columbia and the government of Ontario in exchange for the right to print the statutes that CSA claims to own and that these jurisdictions have passed into law; (k) does CSA provide access to Canadian law at different costs to different customers according to the values that these customers have at various times paid to CSA; (l) does the SCC assure Parliament that CSA does not leverage any value in any form, including contributions of content and labour, from activities related to the CEC for any of its commercial developments including the CSA Handbook; and (m) does the SCC believe that articles and documentation that are developed as part of a ...

52. Points out that the annual summaries provided by the Member States ‘in [their] current form [have] been seen to provide little added value’ and that ‘the compliance elements of the current annual summary simply duplicate information readily available from other sources’ ; urges, therefore, all Member States to increase the usefulness of their annual summaries by including an overall analysis of the results and an overall level of assurance statement to demonstrate their commitment to the sound financial management of Union funds ...[+++]and transparency; urges Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland and Spain in particular to follow without delay the example of the 15 Member States that have included an ‘overall level of assurance statement’ in their annual summaries for structural actions in the European Social Fund (ESF) and the ERDF in order for the Committee on Budgetary Control to benefit from this information during the 2012 discharge procedure; expects that those Member-States who will not submit such a statement in time will submit a comprehensive statement explaining the reasons why;

I would like to assure all Canadians that they can count on us to stand up for their values and for Parliament's role in making laws which prohibit practices that conflict with those values.