Traduction de «write-process-read » (Anglais → Français) :

write-process-read [ write in-read out ]

read-after-write verify [ read after write verify | read-after-write check | read after write check | read-after-write verification ]

write-once read many times | WORM | write once read many times | write-once disk | WORM disk | write once optical disk | WOOD | write-once optical disk | write-once optical disc | write-once data disk | write once read many

write once read many times | WORM | write once | write once read many | write-once-read-many | write-once read-many

read/write head [ combined head | write/read head | combined read/write head | read-write head | R/W head ]

Write Once Read Many | Write Once Read Many times | Write-Once and Read-Many | WORM [Abbr.]

read/write opening | read-write slot

write once | write once read many times | WORM [Abbr.]

write many read always | WMRA | erasable optical disc | erasable optical disk | erasable disc

Definition: The main feature is a specific and significant impairment in the development of spelling skills in the absence of a history of specific reading disorder, which is not solely accounted for by low mental age, visual acuity problems, or inadequate schooling. The ability to spell orally and to write out words correctly are both affected. | Specific spelling retardation (without reading disorder)

Let us take advantage of this excellent initiative by our colleague to pay tribute to our fellow citizens who are involved in this process of learning to read and write.

The question is as follows: With respect to Bill C-32, An Act to amend the Copyright Act: (a) how was this Bill developed; (b) did the government request any specific studies for this Bill and, if so, (i) what was the subject of these studies, (ii) what conclusions did they reach, (iii) what recommendations did they put forward, (iv) what methodology was followed in the studies, (v) on what date were the studies requested, (vi) on what date were the studies submitted, (vii) do the studies contain quantitative analyses (are they supported by data), (viii) what are the quantitative data and in what context are they presented; (c) did the government request an analysis of the Bill’s economic impact on creators’ income and, if so, (i) what op ...[+++]tions did the analysis offer, (ii) what data were collected as part of the analysis, (iii) what conclusions did the analysis reach, (iv) were the ministers of Canadian Heritage and Industry Canada aware of this analysis before it began, (v) on what date was the analysis requested, (vi) on what date was the analysis tabled, (vii) who or which department requested the analysis, (viii) who or which department conducted the analysis, (ix) what guidelines were issued regarding the analysis, (x) to whom or to which department was the analysis submitted, (xi) did the Minister of Canadian Heritage read the analysis after it was submitted, (xii) did the Minister of Industry read the analysis after it was submitted, (xiii) was a minister or an employee of a minister involved in the analysis, or did a minister or an employee of a minister interact with the researchers at any time during the analysis, (xiv) what methodology was followed in the analysis, (xv) did the author(s) of the analysis state the methodological considerations or limitations, either in writing or verbally, (xvi) what are the methodological considerations or limitations stated by the author(s) of this analysis, (xvii) does the analysis contain a quantitative component (is ...

At that time, Southam News was preparing to launch the first Canadian literacy survey, introducing a process based on functionality in its questions, seeking the levels of learning at which citizens could manage fundamental tasks of daily life — basic reading, writing, numeracy, communications — that others simply take for granted.

Ribeiro e Castro (UEN ), in writing (PT) These four recommendations for a second reading on food hygiene and the organisation of official controls form part of a process of legislative reform – the current system is spread across 17 directives, some of which date from 1964 – and adhere to the principle that producers are entirely responsible for the foodstuffs that they produce.