Traduction de «Arrêt de la Cour internationale de Justice » (Français → Anglais) :

The European Commission requested Luxembourg, Poland and Portugal today to comply with judgements of the Court of Justice of the EU related to the good functioning of the internal market for road transport.In 3 judgements from 2016[†], the Court found these Member States to be in breach of EU law (Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009) for not having established national electronic registers of road undertakings and for not having interconnected those with the registers of the other Member States.National electronic registers of road undertaki ...[+++]ng are database which contain some information (such as the name, address and number of vehicles) on all companies that have been authorised to perform commercial operations by a Member State.

the International Court of Justice, based in The Hague, the Netherlands

the International Court of Justice, based in The Hague, the Netherlands

12. Notes the decision of the International Court of Justice with respect to the name dispute issued on 5 December 2011; takes the view that this decision should give a new impetus to ensure that every possible effort is made to solve the name dispute under the auspices of the UN, and calls on the parties to comply with the judgment in good faith and use it to intensify dialogue, stressing at the same time the need for a mutually accepted compromise; welcomes in this regard the statement by the UN-appointed mediator and his call on the parties to view this event as an opportunity to think constructively about their mutual relationship ...[+++]and to consider a renewed initiative with a view to reaching a definitive solution to this issue;

12. Notes the decision of the International Court of Justice with respect to the name dispute issued on 5 December 2011; takes the view that this decision should give a new impetus to ensure that every possible effort is made to solve the name dispute under the auspices of the UN, and calls on the parties to comply with the judgment in good faith and use it to intensify dialogue, stressing at the same time the need for a mutually accepted compromise; welcomes in this regard the statement by the UN-appointed mediator and his call on the parties to view this event as an opportunity to think constructively about their mutual relationship ...[+++]and to consider a renewed initiative with a view to reaching a definitive solution to this issue;

If, six months after the date of the request for arbitration, those States Parties are unable to agree on the organisation of the arbitration, any one of those States Parties may refer the dispute to the International Court of Justice by request in accordance with the Statute of the Court.