Traduction de «Assurance obligatoire des salariés » (Français → Anglais) :

mandatory benefits coverage for employed persons | mandatory insurance for employees

employee mandatorily insured by an occupational benefits scheme | employee mandatorily insured | employee mandatorily insured by a personnel welfare institution | employee subject to mandatory benefit coverage | person subject to mandatory benefit coverage | employee subject to mandatory insurance

employee exempt from mandatory insurance | employee not subject to mandatory benefit coverage | employee exempt from mandatory benefit coverage | employee exempted from mandatory benefit coverage

Convention concerning Compulsory Invalidity Insurance for Persons Employed in Agricultural Undertakings

Convention concerning Compulsory Old-Age Insurance for Persons Employed in Agricultural Undertakings

Convention concerning Compulsory Old-Age Insurance for Persons Employed in Industrial or Commercial Undertakings, in the Liberal Professions, and for Outworkers and Domestic Servants

Convention concerning compulsory old-age insurance for persons employed in agricultural undertakings

Convention concerning compulsory invalidity insurance for persons employed in industrial or commercial undertakings, in the liberal professions, and for outworkers and domestic servants

Convention concerning compulsory invalidity insurance for persons employed in agricultural undertakings

compulsory insurance

3. Where a period of insurance or residence which is completed in accordance with compulsory insurance under the legislation of a Member State coincides with a period of insurance completed on the basis of voluntary insurance or continued optional insurance under the legislation of another Member State, only the period completed on the basis of compulsory insurance shall be taken into account.

To briefly comment on why I am so strongly in support of this mandatory insurance provision, and not to take away from the presentation we will hear from Mr. Zinatelli but perhaps to strongly support the view that licensed insurers should be involved in the provision of this mandatory disability insurance, because the life insurance industry is well regulated today by the provincial financial service regulators and by the federal Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions.

(Return tabled) Question No. 465 Ms. Elizabeth May: With regard to the Nuclear Liability and Compensation Act enacted as part of Bill C-22, with particular reference to the government's decision to increase the absolute liability amount and mandatory insurance coverage for nuclear operators to $1 billion: (a) has the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) asked Ontario Power Generation whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage required under the Act at $1 billion, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, i ...[+++]ncluding the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (b) has the DNR asked Bruce Power whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage required under the Act at $1 billion, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, including the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (c) has the DNR asked New Brunswick Power whether removing the cap on operator liability, while maintaining the level of absolute liability and mandatory insurance coverage, would increase its generation costs and, if so, what were the details of the response, including the estimated increased cost-per-kWh; (d) in the scenario in which the limit on reactor liability is removed while the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator remain at $1 billion, what is the DNR's estimate of the impacts that removing the cap on liability would have on provincial electricity rates, (i) what additional impacts would there be if the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator were increased to $1.5 billion, all other things being equal, (ii) what would the additional impacts be if the mandatory insurance coverage and absolute liability of the operator were increased to $2 billion, all other things being equal; (e) does ...

However, considering that compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles does not cover, under Slovak compulsory insurance law, non‑material damage, Mrs Holingová’s insurer refuses to pay such compensation.