Traduction de «CI » (Français → Anglais) :

cis-trans test | cis/trans test | complementation test | complementation analysis | cis-trans test of functional allelism

Ci permit | permit Ci

(Z,Z)-octadeca-9,12-dienoic acid [ linoleic acid | cis,cis-9,12-octadecadienoic acid | leinoleic acid | linolic acid | 9,12-linoleic acid | 9,12-octadecadienoic acid | cis-9,cis-9,12-octadecadienoic acid | (Z)-9,12-octadecadienoic acid | telfairic acid ]

Ci-Trol heparin control

Definition: The essential feature is recurrent obsessional thoughts or compulsive acts. Obsessional thoughts are ideas, images, or impulses that enter the patient's mind again and again in a stereotyped form. They are almost invariably distressing and the patient often tries, unsuccessfully, to resist them. They are, however, recognized as his or her own thoughts, even though they are involuntary and often repugnant. Compulsive acts or rituals are stereotyped behaviours that are repeated again and again. They are not inherently enjoyable, nor do they result in the completion of inherently useful tasks. Their function is to prevent some o ...[+++]bjectively unlikely event, often involving harm to or caused by the patient, which he or she fears might otherwise occur. Usually, this behaviour is recognized by the patient as pointless or ineffectual and repeated attempts are made to resist. Anxiety is almost invariably present. If compulsive acts are resisted the anxiety gets worse. | anankastic neurosis obsessive-compulsive neurosis

cis-trans effect | cis-trans position effect

the listed conditions whether the disorder is in the pituitary or the hypothalamus

Definition: An episode of depression in which several of the above symptoms are marked and distressing, typically loss of self-esteem and ideas of worthlessness or guilt. Suicidal thoughts and acts are common and a number of somatic symptoms are usually present. | Agitated depression | Major depression | Vital depression | single episode without psychotic symptoms

Pursuant to Standing Order 106(3), a meeting of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights shall be convened within ten sitting days for the purpose of examining the concerns raised in the following letters sent to the Department of Justice: (a) Letter dated April 23, 1998 to the Justice Minister from the User Group on Firearms (copy attached), (b) Letter dated March 30, 1998 to the Justice Minister from the Canadian Police Association (copy attached), and (c) Letter dated July 21, 1997 to the Deputy Minister of Justice from the office of the RCMP Commissioner, J.P.R. Murray (copy attached).

They certainly feel very sensitive, and so they should, because once this gets out even more, Canadians will understand that the Conservatives are now using the tools of the former government, tools similar to those of their cousins over there, who seem quite close to them these days as they work together as a majority government, in harmony and without any accountability aside from that in this corner of the House.

Return tabled Question No. 21 Mr. Svend Robinson: With regard to the transboundary watersheds shared by the State of Alaska and the Province of British Columbia: (a) what investigations, reviews, references, studies or plans of study have been initiated, completed, and planned for in relation to the Alsek, Chilkat, Taiya, Skagway, Taku, Whiting, Stikine, or Unuk transboundary watersheds, in relation to provisions or requirements contained in the International Boundary Waters Treaty Act; (b) how many authorizations or approvals under section 5(1) of the Navigable Waters Protection Act have been issued for each of the transboundary rivers listed in part (a); (c) what is the location of each authorization; (d) how many authorizations or app ...[+++]rovals under section 5(1) of the Navigable Waters Protection Act have been denied for each of the transboundary rivers listed in part (a); (e) what fisheries are located in each of the transboundary rivers listed in part (a); (f) what efforts have been taken to ensure the protection of salmon habitat and safe passage as required and in relation to the Pacific Salmon Treaty for the transboundary watersheds listed in part (a); (g) what investigations, studies or plans of study have been initiated, completed, and planned for in conjunction with the State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game or related United States Departments or Agencies in relation to each of the transboundary watersheds listed in part (a); (h) what investigations have been initiated or completed under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act or the Fisheries Act for each of the transboundary watersheds listed in part (a); and (i) what investigations, reviews, references, studies or plans of study have been initiated, completed, and planned for in relation to the State of Alaska proposal for the “Bradfield Road” transportation corridor?

Motion No. 32 That Bill C-14, in Clause 142, be amended by adding after line 29, on page 65, the following: ``(3) Where the Agency determines that a branch line or a segment thereof is economic or that, although a branch line or segment is uneconomic, there is a reasonable probability of its becoming economic in the foreseeable future, the Agency shall, within six months after the application for the abandonment is received by the Agency, order that the operation of the branch line or segment be abandoned, unless it determines that the operation of the branch line or segment is required in the public interest (4) In determining whether the operation of a branch line or a segment thereof is required in the public interest, the Agency shall c ...[+++]onsider all matters that in its opinion are relevant to the public interest, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing: (a) the actual losses, if any, that are incurred by the railway company in the operation of the branch line or segment; (b) the alternative transportation facilities available or likely to be available in the area served by the branch line or segment, including those proposed to be made available by the applicant, and the ability of those facilities to meet the needs of shippers located in that area; (c) the extent to which the applicant would be prepared to provide and support alternative transportation facilities in lieu of operating the branch line or segment; (d) whether it would be more economic to use alternative transportation facilities in the area served by the branch line or segment; (e) the period of time reasonably required for the purpose of adjusting any facilities that are wholly or partly dependent on the services provided by the branch line or segment with the least disruption to the economy of the area served thereby; (f) the probable effect on other lines and other carriers and on the transportation system generally of the abandonment of the operation of the branch line o ...