Traduction de «Choix et évaluation » (Français → Anglais) :

Parliamentary Office for the Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Choices

office for evaluation of scientific and technological options | parliamentary office for evaluation of scientific and technological options

technology assessment [ European Parliament Office for Scientific and Technological Options Assessment | Scientific and Technical Options Assessment | STOA | technological evaluation ]

branch-and bound search

European Parliament Office for Scientific and Technological Option Assessment

capital budgeting | capital investment appraisal | investment appraisal

branch and bound

programme budgeting [ ABB | activity-based budgeting | BFOR | budget focused on results | PBB | performance-based budgeting | performance budgeting | planning, programming and budgeting system | PPBS | rationalisation of budget choices | RBB | result-based budgeting ]

project evaluation [ project appraisal | programme evaluation(UNBIS) ]

(Return tabled) Question No. 454 Ms. Hélène Laverdière: With regard to the Extractives Cooperation for Enhanced Economic Development (EXCEED) Program under the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development (DFATD): (a) which officials from DFATD and other departments, including the Privy Council Office, will be responsible for administering this program; (b) what was the entire process, including consultation, leading to the establishment of the program and what were the related dates; (c) did an external audit and evaluation committee assess the creation of this program; (d) what are (i) the reasons for establishing this progr ...[+++]am, (ii) the objectives, (iii) the mandate, (iv) the operations of this program; (e) how many employees will be assigned to manage and administer this program and what are their responsibilities; (f) are projects required to focus exclusively on African countries; (g) why was Latin America not included in this program; (h) what is the process for submitting project proposals; (i) will there be a tendering process; (j) when will the next request for proposals be issued; (k) how many project proposals has the program received since it was established; (l) what are the selection criteria and what is the complete project selection process; (m) who is eligible for funding under the program; (n) can private-sector companies receive funding under this program; (o) will a webpage be created on the DFATD website; (p) how much does this initiative cost; (q) what type of funding does this program award; (r) can the public or businesses contribute to the program now or in the future; (s) why was an initial budget of $25 million allocated; (t) will the budget be increased or decreased; (u) why was this program not announced in Canada’s Economic Action Plan 2014; (v) what indicators and measurement tools will be used to assess the effectiveness of projects funded by the program; (w) what specific measures have been taken and wha ...

1. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the extent to which it is necessary to revise the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and other current requirements laid down in network and media regulations (e.g. the telecommunications package) with respect to the rules on findability and non-discriminatory access to platforms, for content providers and content developers as well as for users, expanding the concept of platforms, and to adapt the existing instruments to new constellations; whereas it should be ensured in so doing that consumers can benefit from increased choice and acces ...[+++]s to audiovisual media services and that content providers can benefit from more choices in how to distribute their content while maintaining contact with their audience;

The drilling sequence selected and the number, location and characteristics of the projected boreholes are not risk-free in terms of their possible environmental impact and must therefore not be decided unilaterally by the operator but made subject to environmental impact assessment under Directive 2001/42/EC of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, prior to the necessary authorisation by the Member States and without prejudice to environmental impact assessments specifically relating to each of the drilling operations in accordance with Directive2011/92/EU, which does not exclude but complements th ...[+++]e above provisions.

2. Believes that policymakers should have at their disposal more accurate, up-to-date and comprehensive scientific data to enable them to make informed choices; agrees, therefore, with the European Council that Europe’s potential for the sustainable extraction and use of shale gas and shale oil resources, without putting the availability and quality of water resources at risk, should be assessed and mapped in order to potentially enhance security of supply; welcomes the assessments made by Member States and encourages them to continue this work, and asks the Commission to contribute to assessing the potential of shale gas and shale oil ...[+++] reserves in the EU by assembling results from Member States’ assessments and available results from exploration projects, as well as by analysing and evaluating the industrial, economic, energy and environmental and health aspects of domestic shale gas production;