Traduction de «Comité d'examen » (Français → Anglais) :

consideration in committee

Scientific Advisory Committee on the Toxicity and Ecotoxicity of Chemical Compounds | Scientific Advisory Committee to examine the toxicity and ecotoxicity of chemical compounds

Coast Guard Legislative Affairs Review Council [ CLARC | Coast Guard Senior Management Legislation and Regulations Review Committee | Maritime Code Policy Committee | Senior Regulations Review Committee | Marine Legislation Coordinating Committee ]

Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations [ REGS | Standing Joint Committee on Scrutiny of Regulations | Standing Joint Committee on Regulations and other Statutory Instruments | Standing Joint Committee for Regulatory Scrutiny | Special Committee on Statutory Instruments ]

Advisory Committee on Unfair Pricing Practices in Maritime Transport

board of examiners [ examination board | examining board | examining committee ]

institutional review board | IRB | independent ethics committee | IEC | ethics review committee | ethics committee | committee for the protection of subjects

scope of the review | scope of a review

Lawyers' Examination Board

interim review | interim review engagement | review of interim financial information | review of interim financial statements

It was agreed, - That the Sub-Committee on Agenda and Procedure consider the following, assign a priority to each and report back to the Committee: Review of the Oceans Act, Aquaculture Study, Fisheries at Burnt Church, NB, Fraser River Salmon Allocations, Atlantic Fisheries Policy Review results, activities of the Independent Panel on Access Criteria, Newfoundland Shrimp Fishery, Dogfish Quotas.

60. Notes that in 2013 OLAF issued 353 recommendations for administrative, disciplinary, financial or judicial action to be taken by the relevant EU institutions, bodies, offices, agencies or the competent national authorities, and that about EUR 402,8 million was recommended for recovery; is concerned that the rate of indictment following OLAF’s judicial recommendations for the period 2006-2013 is only about 54 %; is worried, as the low rate of indictment also sheds a bad light on the quality and usability of OLAF’s investigative results; calls on the Commission to urgently improve the effectiveness of OLAF; deems that a fully-fledg ...[+++]ed and proper oversight over OLAF’s affairs by the Supervisory Committee (without interference in ongoing investigations) is indispensable, and therefore urges the Commission and OLAF to improve the current situation in which the Supervisory Committee is not able to fulfil its purpose; also regrets the lack of information available on conviction rates in cases involving offences against the Union’s budget;

8. Notes with concern that the recruitment procedures examined showed the three shortcomings, namely that questions for written tests and interviews were set after the applications had been examined by the selection board, that there was no evidence that the weighting of the selection criteria used for short listing was set before the examination of the applications and that selection boards did not appropriately document all their meetings and decisions; calls on the Office to remedy this situation and to report on this within the framework of the 2012 discharge follow-up;

4. After the completion of the mid-term review, and as part of the interim evaluation referred to in point (a) of Article 57(2) , the Commission shall report on the mid-term review to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.