Traduction de «Comité de contrôle des modifications » (Français → Anglais) :

Change Advisory Board [ CAB | Change Control Board ]

Basle Committee | Basle Supervisor's Committee | Committee on Banking Regulations and Supervisory Practices | Cooke Committee

Advisory Board on Quality Control of Test Items

change control

Land Materiel Modification Review Board Modification Proposal

Environmental Contaminants Act Amendments Consultative Committee

password control of changes

quality review committee | peer review committee

monitoring committee

29. Points out that in many Member States, such as Sweden, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany, independent bodies provide governments with constructive input in connection with legislative processes, with the aim of cutting red tape for business and citizens and of measurably and verifiably reducing costs related to obligations to provide information; notes that the best practices and experience of existing better regu ...[+++]lation bodies could be taken into account; takes note of the conversion of the Commission’s Impact Assessment Board (IAB) into an independent ‘Regulatory Scrutiny Board’ (RSB) and expects that the inclusion of independent experts will have an advantageous effect on the impact assessment process within the Commission; insists that the Regulatory Scrutiny Board has only an exclusively advisory role and must not issue binding opinions; insist that impact assessments must be consistent and take any changes introduced at the inter-service consultation phase into consideration and should be based inter alia on estimating what the additional costs would be for the Member States if there were no solution at European level; considers that the opinion of the RSB should accompany the final legislative proposal; proposes to discuss in the forthcoming negotiation on the interinstitutional agreement the idea whether a Regulatory Control Council might be of common interest for the institutions as a purely advisory body;

23. Welcomes the decision of the Commission not to proceed with an inter-service consultation without a positive opinion of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board (RSB); however, notes the importance of consistency and that the final proposal and impact assessment must be consistent and must therefore reflect any changes introduced at the inter-service consultation phase; considers, therefore, that the positive opinion of the RSB is essential to accompany the final legislative proposal presented to the College, and not only for the drafts presented at an earlier stage;

6. Reiterates the importance of developing the use of impact assessments, which should be undertaken throughout the whole policy cycle and should be living documents that are updated when new significant amendments are introduced during the legislative process; stresses that thorough impact assessments should include a full evaluation of subsidiarity compliance, as this is essential to improve the trust of citizens who regard the subsidiarity principle as a key aspect of the democratic process; calls for further steps to ensure there is effective independent scrutiny of impact assessments, and specifically calls for the Regulatory Scrutiny Board to be se ...[+++]parate from the Commission if it is to be truly independent, so as to fulfil the objective of ensuring independent impact assessments and enhance the quality of EU legislation;

Would your preference be that we invent a new office, a new oversight committee, or would it be that we try to simply assign the responsibility for monitoring this legislation and these legislative changes to an existing office?