Traduction de «Contr Mar » (Français → Anglais) :

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 February 2013 in Case T-159/11 Marszalkowski v OHIM — Mar-Ko Fleischwaren (WALICHNOWY MARKO), by which the General Court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 January 2011 (Case R 760/2010-4) which annulled the decision of the Opposition Division dismissing the opposition brought by the proprietor of the Community word mark ‘Mar-Ko’ in respect of goods in Class 29 of the Nice Agreement — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark ( ...[+++]OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) and Article 48(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion

set aside the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 March 2013, notified to the Commission on 22 March 2013, in Case T-92/11 Jorgen Andersen v European Commission;

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 25 March 2009 in Case T-191/07 Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) by which that Court dismissed an action brought by the applicant for the word mark “BUDWEISER” for goods in class 32 seeking annulment of Decision R 299/2006-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 March 2007, dismissing the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing registration of the mark in opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the international figurative and word marks “BUDWEISER” a ...[+++]nd “Budweiser Budvar” for goods in classes 31 and 32.

(Return tabled) Question No. 173 Mr. Rodger Cuzner: With respect to Agent Orange and Canadian veterans trying to obtain fair compensation for their exposure to Agent Orange spraying at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown: (a) what is the total amount of money spent by all federal departments and agencies, excluding the Department of Justice, for the time period of July 1, 2005, to March 4, 2010, in its defence against the Canadian veterans' Agent Orange class action lawsuit; (b) what is the total amount of money the government has spent to hire outside legal counsel for the time period of July 1, 2005, to March 4, 2010, in its defence against ...[+++] the Canadian veterans' Agent Orange class action lawsuit; and (c) what is the total amount of money spent, including all costs associated with the work of Department of Justice officials, for the time period of January 1, 2009, to March 4, 2010, in its defence against the Canadian veterans' Agent Orange class action lawsuit?

the declaration of the European Council of Gent, of 9 October 2001, on follow-up to the September 11 attacks and the fight against terrorism, the Plan of Action to combat terrorism of the European Council of 21 September 2001, revised under the conclusions of the European Council of 25 March 2004, the joint programme of the Council and the Commission, of 20 December 2002, to improve cooperation in the European Union for preventing and limiting the consequences of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear terrorism (CBRN-programme) , the first annual Presidency report (2003) to the Council on the implementation of the Joint CBRN Prog ...[+++]ramme , the Declaration of the European Council of 25 March 2004 on Combating Terrorism, including the Declaration on solidarity against terrorism , the Presidency conclusions of the European Council of 17-18 June 2004 , the Presidency report to the European Council on the implementation of the Declaration on combating Terrorism and the Revised Plan of Action/Road-Map on Combating Terrorism;

Following the terrorist attacks of 11 March 2004 in Spain, the European Council of 25 March 2004 again highlighted the crucial role of Eurojust in its Declaration on combating terrorism. It urged Member States to take any measures that remain necessary to fully implement the Eurojust Decision by June 2004 and called on them "to ensure that the optimum and most effective use is made of existing EU bodies, in particular Europol and Eurojust, to promote cooperation in the fight against terrorism" and that Eurojust "is used to the maximum extent" for this purpose.