Traduction de «Directrice des avantages sociaux » (Français → Anglais) :

F. whereas the guidelines call for monetisation of impacts wherever possible; whereas, while short-term costs to business can normally be monetised, long-term benefits of regulatory action are often impossible to quantify in monetary terms (for example, reducing health impairments or maintaining eco-systems); whereas the emphasis on quantification wherever possible therefore introduces a structural bias in favour of more easily quantifiable aspects such as costs to economic operators as compared with social and environmental benefits, thus failing to adequately consider societal costs and benefits as a whole, and in particular social a ...[+++]nd environmental costs and benefits;

F. whereas the guidelines call for monetisation of impacts wherever possible; whereas, while short-term costs to business can normally be monetised, long-term benefits of regulatory action are often impossible to quantify in monetary terms (for example, reducing health impairments or maintaining eco-systems); whereas the emphasis on quantification wherever possible therefore introduces a structural bias in favour of more easily quantifiable aspects such as costs to economic operators as compared with social and environmental benefits, thus failing to adequately consider societal costs and benefits as a whole, and in particular social a ...[+++]nd environmental costs and benefits;

1. Welcomes the Commission’s commitment to regularly reviewing the impact assessment guidelines with a view to improving the IA methodology; calls on the Commission to ensure that economic, social and environmental aspects are assessed in equal depth; urges the Commission to ensure that qualitative assessments are fully taken into consideration in order to avoid a structural bias in favour of more easily quantifiable aspects such as costs to economic operators as compared with equally important social and environmental benefits; welcomes the Commission’s commitment to assessing compatibility with fundamental rights;

1. Welcomes the Commission’s commitment to regularly reviewing the impact assessment guidelines with a view to improving the IA methodology; calls on the Commission to ensure that economic, social and environmental aspects are assessed in equal depth; urges the Commission to ensure that qualitative assessments are fully taken into consideration in order to avoid a structural bias in favour of more easily quantifiable aspects such as costs to economic operators as compared with equally important social and environmental benefits; welcomes the Commission’s commitment to assessing compatibility with fundamental rights;

27. Calls on the Member States to collect, compile and publish annually comprehensive, accurate, reliable and gender-disaggregated statistics relating to the following: the labour market, housing, education and training, health and social benefits, public access to goods and services, the criminal justice system, and civic and political participation, and to set clear, quantitative targets and indicators within the employment and social inclusion guidelines that enable them to measure progress in the situation of migrants and/or minorities;

The Court has not yet been called upon to pronounce on this specific point, but it has previously held that as there is no consensus among the Member States whether same sex partners can be assimilated to spouses of a traditional marriage, it should be concluded that same sex spouses do not yet have the same rights as traditional spouses for the purposes of Community law on the free movement of workers [47].However, it should be noted that if a Member State accords advantages to its own nationals who live as non-married couples, under the principle of equal treatment in social ...[+++] advantages (see section 2.4 above) the same advantages must be granted to migrant workers [48].