Traduction de «Empiètement sur le capital » (Français → Anglais) :

With regard to the claims for the Tribunal, first, to order the applicant’s post to be regraded to a grade corresponding to the level of his responsibilities and, secondly, to order the EEAS to bear all the consequences, in particular the financial consequences, of that regrading, retrospectively from the time of his entry into the service, it should be noted that, in the context of an action brought under Article 91 of the Staff Regulations, the court may not, without encroaching upon the powers of the administration, make declarations or findings of principle, or issue directions to an institution (see order in Caminiti v Commission, F ...[+++]‑71/09, EU:F:2011:53, paragraph 23 and the case-law cited therein).

Suppose a private sector distribution system other than CPAC came along, though. If it wanted to enter into an arrangement and was prepared to pay the capital and personnel costs in order to achieve a greater distribution, albeit through something other than CPAC, surely one could devise a contractual agreement that would take into account some of the questions that were raised by my colleagues.

The other thing we're doing is there are a lot of people who buy long-term assets and have a tough time finding a long-term debt to finance the long-term asset, and what happens is it eats into their working capital if they don't get the matching right between a long-term asset and a long-term debt.

This should be done in a way that respects the balance of powers between the Institutions and does not impinge on their respective roles and powers.

We recommend that the Government of Canada engage First Nations in a process of consultation, justification and accommodation in accord with the doctrine established by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Sparrow, and subsequent decisions, in respect of any act or decision that has impacted or infringed or may impact upon or infringe the rights of First Nations recognized and affirmed under section 25 and section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982; and that the scope of the process of consultation, justification and accommodation include: all legislation and regulations enacted by Parliament or enacted by the provincial legislatures in the absence of clear federal powers since at least 1982 that continue to impact upon or infringe the autho ...[+++]rity of First Nation governments and the rights of First Nation citizens, including legislation defining the status of First Nation citizens or affecting First Nation authority over the protection and care of First Nation children and families; and all federal authorizations, allocations and designations issued prior to 1982 that have continued to impact upon or infringe the rights of First Nations since 1982, including those federal authorizations, allocations or designations related to natural resource developments such as hydroelectric projects, mining projects and forestry projects.

No one could foresee entirely where the market would go, and we went through a process where you could leap over the barriers and be in everybody else's business by using your capital base.