Traduction de «Erreur sur les qualités du cocontractant » (Français → Anglais) :

mistake as to attributes mistake as to attributes

mistake as to characteristic | mistake as to quality

mistake as to attribute

mistake as to quality [ mistake as to characteristic ]

2. Stresses that there is an important difference in the type of errors and that a distinction should be drawn between major errors, such as overpayment/underpayment or fraud, and minor and clerical errors; notes that the main root causes for the error rate are mistakes in aid applications, low quality of on-the-spot checks and insufficient quality and update of the Land Parcel Identification System, whereas errors/non-compliances ...[+++] by national administration are isolated cases;

in the medium and long term, consumers appreciate products of a consistently high quality; the advertising of quality control schemes which aim to achieve consistently high quality standards is likely to promote consumer confidence in Community agricultural production, improve farm incomes and thus promote the development of the sector as a whole moreover, quality products clearly have specific characteristics which are not shared by other similar products; advertising of these characteristics will not mislead the consumer and is also likely to contribute to the development of the sector; for those reasons, instead of being spread on ...[+++]the basis of a set of positive criteria as in the past, support should be focused on advertising campaigns in favour of quality products defined as products fulfilling the criteria established pursuant to Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.

‘quality control’ or ‘QC’ means a system of routine technical activities to measure and control the quality of the information and estimates compiled with the purpose of ensuring data integrity, correctness and completeness, identifying and addressing errors and omissions, documenting and archiving data and other material used, and recording all QA activities.

6. Is concerned that annual accounts of the Joint Undertaking received a qualified opinion from the Court of Auditors on the legality and the regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts on the grounds that the error rate resulting from the ex post audits was 6,16 %; notes that the Joint Undertaking completed ex-post audits covering EUR 44 300 000 (18,8 % of all cost claims received by the Joint Undertaking in the triennium beginning in 2008); regrets that the error rate resulting from those ex post audits was 6,16 % and 4,09 % when taking into account the corrective actions implemented ...[+++]such as a recovery mechanism; reiterates that the Joint Undertaking should reinforce without delay the quality of its ex-ante controls related to the grant management; requests that the discharge authority is informed of the results of the following ex-post audit processes conducted by the Joint Undertaking and that a detailed progress report be produced which makes specific proposals for a gradual reduction in error rates;