Traduction de «Groupe de travail spécial des garanties de sécurité » (Français → Anglais) :

3. The relevant work programme or work plan may exclude entities unable to provide satisfactory security guarantees, including as regards personnel security clearance if justified by security reasons.

The Youth Guarantee keeps young people in touch with the labour market and contributes to their long-term employment security.

(Return tabled) Question No. 164 Mr. Peter Julian: With regard to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) working groups: (a) what are the regulatory changes, regulatory harmonization, procedural changes, and new programming initiatives proposed by each SPP working group; (b) what are the proposal and the proposals that have led, or are leading to regulatory changes, regulatory harmonization, procedural changes, and new programming initiatives, in every area covered by each working group; (c) what are the names of any and all sub-working groups along with a description of their tasks and issues to cover; (d) what is the lead cou ...[+++]ntry, the agency and the department responsible for each sub-working group; (e) who are the lead officials and the members for each sub-working group; (f) how many person-hours each division with responsibility for a part of the SPP has dedicated to SPP-related tasks, by year for 2005, 2006 and 2007; (g) what share, by division, do SPP-related tasks account by year for 2005, 2006 and 2007; (h) in which working group and sub-working group are copyright-related issues covered; (i) what role have the ongoing SPP negotiations in this area played in the formulation of the government’s copyright-reform legislation; (j) at which SPP meetings was Canadian copyright reform discussed, and who were the participants; (k) how much coordination is there among SPP working groups and their sub-working groups; (l) what is the nature of this coordination, for which the government has indicated it has hired several individuals in the Public Safety and Industry Departments; (m) what are the duties and responsibilities of these individuals; (n) at what level are tradeoffs among the various working groups discussed; (o) how does the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) interact with the sub-working groups; (p) how often do NACC members interact with officials working on SPP-related projects; (q) who are the lead NACC contacts for eac ...

7. IS OF THE VIEW that, when considering with other Parties further commitments for Annex I Parties, a number of other issues will need to be explored, and LOOKS FORWARD to identifying these issues in time for the Ad hoc Open-ended Working Group on Article 3(9) of the Kyoto Protocol and with a view to informing the review process under Article 9(2) of the Protocol; EMPHASISES the need to ensure that there is no gap between the first and second commitment periods; LOOKS FORWARD to a successful discussion in the Ad hoc Open-ende ...[+++]d Working Group on Article 3(9) of the Kyoto Protocol;

12. WELCOMES the outcome of the fourth meeting of the Ad hoc Open-ended Working Group on Access and Benefit-sharing and, signalling the need for a review of the progress made in this Working Group, for in-depth continuation of its work and for the determination of a work schedule with the aim of an early elaboration, negotiation and conclusion of the proposed regime, SUPPORTS the endorsement of its recommendations by COP 8; RECALLS its commitment to negotiate an international regime on access and benefit-sharing as contained in the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation and in COP Decision VII/19; EMPHASISES that such a regime could be co ...[+++]mposed of one or more binding or non legally binding instruments where some elements form an integral part of existing international instruments, institutions and other fora while others are developed as self-standing elements within the framework of the CBD, in synergy with and mutual supportiveness of other relevant international institutions and fora; STRESSES the need to ensure equal attention to access and benefit-sharing aspects;

7. RECALLS that COP 7 adopted a Programme of Work on protected areas with the objective of the establishment and maintenance by 2010 for terrestrial and by 2012 for marine areas of a comprehensive, effectively managed, and ecologically representative national and regional systems of protected areas to be integrated in a global network; NOTES with great concern that implementation is lagging behind and EMPHASISES the need for more effective measures and adequate technical and financial support, including improved integration of protected areas as valuable assets in national and local development processes, to reach the goals and targets of the programme of work; in this context, UNDERLINES that COP 8 should adopt a mechanism and work sched ...[+++]ule for a clear and efficient process to review implementation of the Programme of Work which should focus on the goals and targets contained therein, including the identification of obstacles, gaps and possible responses; HIGHLIGHTS the importance of ensuring further work of the Ad hoc Open-ended Working Group on Protected Areas to support and review progress on implementation;