Traduction de «Importance militaire » (Français → Anglais) :

military significance [ military importance ]

territory designated as being of military importance

Definition: States of subjective distress and emotional disturbance, usually interfering with social functioning and performance, arising in the period of adaptation to a significant life change or a stressful life event. The stressor may have affected the integrity of an individual's social network (bereavement, separation experiences) or the wider system of social supports and values (migration, refugee status), or represented a major developmental transition or crisis (going to school, becoming a parent, failure to attain a cherished personal goal, retirement). Individual predisposition or vulnerability plays an important role in the risk of ...[+++] occurrence and the shaping of the manifestations of adjustment disorders, but it is nevertheless assumed that the condition would not have arisen without the stressor. The manifestations vary and include depressed mood, anxiety or worry (or mixture of these), a feeling of inability to cope, plan ahead, or continue in the present situation, as well as some degree of disability in 9the performance of daily routine. Conduct disorders may be an associated feature, particularly in adolescents. The predominant feature may be a brief or prolonged depressive reaction, or a disturbance of other emotions and conduct. | Culture shock Grief reaction Hospitalism in children

import-competing goods

extent of a military exercise

materiality | concept of materiality | materiality principle | significance

Indeed, by almost any measure of military significance, Canada's military role in NATO was only militarily important to the alliance for about a decade and a half, from roughly 1952 to 1968, when Canada placed relatively large, well-armed, well-equipped ground and air forces at the disposal of the Supreme Allied Commander, Europe (SACEUR).

Our strategic geographic location has long been recognized for its military strength, yet military spending in this province is remarkably low.

1. Notes that the EU and its Member States are major funders of the various peace and crisis management operations throughout the world while CSDP civilian and military missions and operations constitute a very small share of all funding; acknowledges the importance of CSDP interventions for achieving peace, while encouraging Member States to adopt a more pronounced stance towards conflict prevention, post-conflict reconstruction and maintenance of sustainable peace in conflict-ridden zones; regrets the modest nature of CSDP interve ...[+++]ntions, especially the military ones, consisting mainly of small-scale military training missions instead of substantial European contributions to peacekeeping and peace enforcement; is convinced that the EU cannot allow itself to focus exclusively on instruments for a post-crisis context or for supporting exit from crisis, but must, rather, be capable of intervention across the full spectrum of crisis management;

It provides some nationally-unique and critical research capabilities in such areas as medical defence against chemical-biological agents, blast injury, elements of mental health, and other militarily-significant areas.