Traduction de «Impression de documents de réception » (Français → Anglais) :

Multifunction Device: A Multifunction Device (MFD) is a physically integrated device or a combination of functionally integrated components (the ‘base unit’, see definition below) that produces hard copy duplicates from graphical hard copy originals (distinct from single sheet convenience copying, see next paragraph) as well as performing one or both of the following core functions: printing of documents (from digital information received from direct connect computers, networked computers, file servers and fax transmissions) or faxing (send and receive).

The default output speed of the product, which shall be used in the actual testing, is not measured and may differ from the maximum claimed speed due to factors such as settings for resolution, image quality, printing modes, document scan time, job size and structure, and paper size and weight.

It is active chiefly in four markets: fiduciary printing (partly covered by the legal monopoly granted to IN for official documents), continuous printing, rotary printing and sheet printing.

The restructuring aid of €197 million approved by the Commission is linked to a restructuring plan which should enable IN to refocus on its traditional business, namely security printing (for the fiduciary document and continuous printing markets).

including in an advertisement a direct exhortation to children to buy advertised products or to persuade their parents or other adults to buy advertised products for them; claiming that a product has been approved, endorsed or authorised by a public or private body when it has not; falsely stating that the product will only be available for a very limited time, or that it will only be available on particular terms for a very limited time, in order to elicit an immediate decision and deprive consumers of sufficient opportunity or time to make an informed choice; promoting a product similar to a product made by a particular manufacturer in such a manner as deliberately to mislead the consumer into believing that the product is made by that ...[+++] same manufacturer when it is not; falsely claiming or creating the impression that the trader is not acting for purposes relating to his trade, business, craft or profession, or falsely representing oneself as a consume; creating the false impression that after-sales service in relation to the product is available in a Member State other than the one in which the product is sold; requiring a consumer who wishes to claim on an insurance policy to produce documents which could not reasonably be considered relevant as to whether the claim was valid, or systematically failing to reply to related correspondence; creating the false impression that the consumer has won, is to win or will on doing a particular act win a prize, when in fact either there is no prize or taking any action in relation to claiming the prize is subject to the consumer paying money or incurring a cost.

After 183 days of televised hearings, 121 witnesses, thousands of pages of transcripts, and after receiving over 150,000 documents, the government wishes to receive the advice and the counsel of the commissioners.