Traduction de «Juge principal régional » (Français → Anglais) :

29B.05 Where all related trials are in the same region of the Superior Court of Justice, the Regional Senior Judge or his or her designate shall determine whether a judge should be appointed to adjudicate the issues in related trials.

6. Calls for joint action by the European funds, in particular the instruments of cohesion policy, the ESF and ERDF, to stimulate investments for growth and jobs and to find an urgent answer to this worrying situation; points out that SMEs are the engine of Europe, the cornerstone of employment and the main actor for bringing the crisis to an end; considers it necessary, therefore, to provide them with better access to financing and to the business environment in which they operate; encourages the European Investment Bank to invest in job creation for young people, counting on spin-off benefits, provided that it grants loans primarily to SMEs; calls for particular attention to be given to all those regions hardest hit by youth unemploym ...[+++]ent and emphasises that European structural and investment funds can help companies, especially SMEs, hiring young people and reducing youth unemployment and also take the measures necessary for the labour market, education and training in order to support workers’ transition to the local employment markets as they acquire new skills and jobs (including green jobs, jobs required as a result of demographic trends, new technologies, and the diversification of employment in rural areas); invites the Member States and regional and local authorities to set up integrated territorial development strategies, including training and employment components, starting with measures to avoid early school leaving, and to build employment pathways for young people;

6. Considers that there is an inherent complexity in the regional economic structure and a certain degree of interdependence between economic, social and environmental issues; takes the view that, although GDP is still a relevant and rigorous measurement of development in the implementation of the programmes in regions and cities, it is sometimes likely to provide an incomplete impression that takes no account of the actual situation in the regions; considers, therefore, that a robust, fair, open and scientific debate on the merits of other indicators in addition to GDP should take place; underlines that whereas GDP should remain the ...[+++]main criterion for Objective 1, other criteria should also be used to categorise and prioritise support to Objective 2 regions, based on the respective social, economic, environmental, demographical and geographical challenges which they face, in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006; notes that the Member States might consider investigating further indicators – environmental and social factors, for example – that give a broader picture of the well-being of society, the specific characteristics of Objectives 1 and 2 regions and cities and the added value produced by EU policies at national level, with the aim of not leaving vast and poorly developed areas outside the development offered by the common European cohesion policy;

Another judge from a higher German court in a border area commented that the level of knowledge of Community law varied very widely among parties. This was the main factor determining the frequency with which Community law was raised.

7. Considers that the strategy proposed by the Commission is a first step towards tackling the specific problems of the border regions by means of a targeted package of measures;

5. Considers that improvements in the implementation of the subsidiarity principle are needed; in this connection, calls on the Member States, in line with their constitutions, to involve regions with legislative powers, because they are directly affected in the process of drafting an EU constitution, calls for an increase in the powers of Parliament, as a directly-elected body representing the citizens, to enact and review legislation, and stresses its central role in implementing the catalogue of principles; also considers that th ...[+++]e COR’s institutional links with Parliament and the other EU Institutions in preparing legislation and in monitoring the subsidiarity principle should be reviewed;