Traduction de «Marchandises déclarées à la douane » (Français → Anglais) :

(15) For further legal clarity and in order to protect the interests of legitimate traders from possible abuse of the border enforcement provisions, it is appropriate to modify the time limits for detaining goods suspected of infringing an intellectual property right, the conditions in which information about consignments is to be passed on to right-holders by customs authorities, and the conditions for applying the procedure allowing for destruction of the goods under customs control for suspected infringements of intellectual property rights. other than for counterfeit and pirated goods and Where customs authorities take action followi ...[+++]ng the granting of an application, it is also appropriate to introduce a provision allowing the holder of the goods to express his/her views before the customs administration takes a decision which would adversely affect him/her suspends the release of or detains goods suspected of infringing intellectual property rights that are not counterfeit or pirated goods, as it may be difficult for customs authorities to determine upon mere visual examination whether an intellectual property right might be infringed .

where, in respect of goods declared for a customs procedure entailing the obligation to pay duties, the customs declaration is invalidated;

76. Is disappointed at the Commission's negative reaction to paragraph 123 in the 2002 Commission discharge resolution of 21 April 2004 , which states ".that the Commission allows goods which have been incorrectly or falsely declared to be regarded as not being involved in the transit procedure, with the result that the guarantee cannot be reclaimed, that the papers have to be sent back to the country of entry into the EU, and that the campaign to combat fraud is impeded; ..". calls again on the Commission to put an immediate end to this practice and to propose an appropriate amendment to the Customs Code;

75. Is disappointed at the Commission's negative reaction to paragraph 123 in the 2002 Commission discharge resolution, which states (...) that the Commission allows goods which have been incorrectly or falsely declared to be regarded as not being involved in the transit procedure, with the result that the guarantee cannot be reclaimed, that the papers have to be sent back to the country of entry into the EU, and that the campaign to combat fraud is impeded; (...); calls again on the Commission to put an immediate end to this practice and to propose an appropriate amendment to the Customs Code;

1. Deferment of payment shall not be granted in respect of amounts of duty which, although relating to goods entered for a customs procedure which entails the obligation to pay such duty, are entered in the accounts in accordance with the provisions in force concerning acceptance of incomplete declarations, because the declarant has not, by the time of expiry of the period set, provided the information necessary for the definitive valuation of the goods for customs purposes or has not supplied the particulars or the document missing when the incomplete declaration was accepted.

( A ) FOR GOODS DECLARED FOR DIRECT HOME USE , THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE CUSTOMS AUTHORITIES OF THE DECLARANT'S STATEMENT OF HIS INTENTION THAT THE GOODS SHOULD ENTER INTO HOME USE :