Traduction de «Ordonnance sur l'administration du Parlement » (Français → Anglais) :

Federal Assembly Ordinance of 3 October 2003 on the Parliament Act and on Parliamentary Administration | Parliamentary Administration Ordinance [ PAdminO ]

Federal Assembly Ordinance of 3 October 2003 on its Delegations in International Parliamentary Sessions and on the Fostering of Relations with the Parliaments of other Countries | Parliamentary Delegations Ordinance [ PDO ]

Audiovisual Media Services Directive | Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) | AVMSD [Abbr.]

Directive 2014/67/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the enforcement of Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (‘the IMI Regulation’) | Enforcement Directive | Enforcement Directive on Posting of Workers

Library of Parliament and Federal Administration | Parliamentary and Central Library | LPFA [Abbr.]

Proclaiming the Representation Order to be in Force Upon the Dissolution of the 33rd Parliament of Canada

Federal Assembly Ordinance of 28 September 2012 on International Parliamentary Relations [ OIPR ]

Consumer and Corporate Affairs and Government Operations [ The CCA and Government Operations Committee of Parliament ]

Accountability, Answerability (to Parliament) and Management Responsibility

The powers of the Constitutional Court to check the constitutionality of the decisions adopted by the Parliament have effectively been reinstated by means of the Constitutional Court's judgments, and Emergency Ordinance 38 is therefore "de facto" inapplicable.[3] The repeal of Emergency Ordinance 41 ensured respect for the Court's rulings on the quorum for a referendum.

With regard to the claims for the Tribunal, first, to order the applicant’s post to be regraded to a grade corresponding to the level of his responsibilities and, secondly, to order the EEAS to bear all the consequences, in particular the financial consequences, of that regrading, retrospectively from the time of his entry into the service, it should be noted that, in the context of an action brought under Article 91 of the Staff Regulations, the court may not, without encroaching upon the powers of the administration, make declarations or findings of principle, or issue directions to an institution (see order in Caminiti v Commission, F ...[+++]‑71/09, EU:F:2011:53, paragraph 23 and the case-law cited therein).

First, as regards the rule that the application correspond to the complaint and the purpose of the pre-litigation procedure, it should be stressed that the pre-litigation procedure laid down by Article 90 of the Staff Regulations, which is applicable to temporary officials pursuant to Article 46 of the CEOS, as a whole, is intended to permit and encourage the amicable settlement of differences which have arisen between officials and the administration (Case 142/85 Schwiering v Court of Auditors [1986] ECR 3177, paragraph 11; Case 133/88 Del Amo Martinez v Parliament [1989] EC ...[+++]R 689, paragraph 9; and Case T-57/89 Alexandrakis v Commission [1990] ECR II-143, paragraph 8) and to compel the authority having control over the official to reconsider its decision in the light of any objections which that official may make (Case 101/79 Vecchioli v Commission [1980] ECR 3069, paragraph 31, and Case T-53/92 Piette de Stachelski v Commission [1993] ECR II-35, paragraph 16).

E. whereas Israeli military administrative detention orders allow detention without charge or trial on the basis of evidence that is not accessible to either the detainees or their lawyers, and whereas such orders may be of up to six months’ duration and may be renewed indefinitely; whereas the Supreme Court of Israel recently criticised the military courts and the Military Advocate General’s Corps for their actions in extending administrative detention orders;