Traduction de «PIB nominal » (Français → Anglais) :

(b)a maximum of 0,5 % of nominal GDP applying in the first case of non-compliance with an excessive deficit procedure as referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 9 and a maximum of 0,25 % of nominal GDP applying in the first case of non-compliance relating to a corrective action plan under an excessive imbalances procedure as referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 9 or non-compliance with recommended corrective action under an excessive imbalances procedure as referred to in point (c) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 9.

In our numbers, sir, and if you look at nominal GDP, which has affected the way we look at the tax base, over the medium term we've basically downgraded nominal GDP again, which is about $1.7 trillion in the Canadian economy today, by roughly about $50 billion.

Given that we have added full employment in addition to nominal GDP, and we know that nominal GDP discussions and proposals have been, among others.The Economist Intelligence Unit has put forth some ideas on this and also the C.D. Howe Institute's Monetary Policy Council, and people like Scott Sumner, so we understand that is covered in terms of the C.D. Howe Institute Monetary Policy Council.

1. The NUTS level 2 regions which would have been eligible for Convergence objective status under Article 5(1) had the eligibility threshold remained at 75 % of the average GDP of the EU-15, but which lose eligibility because their nominal GDP per capita level will exceed 75 % of the average GDP of the EU-25, measured and calculated according to Article 5(1), shall be eligible, on a transitional and specific basis, for financing by the Structural Funds under the Convergence objective.

2. The NUTS level 2 regions totally covered by Objective 1 in 2006 under Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 whose nominal GDP level per capita, measured and calculated according to Article 5(1), will exceed 75 % of the average GDP of the EU15 shall be eligible, on a transitional and specific basis, for financing by the Structural Funds under the Regional competitiveness and employment objective.

That's the basis for suggesting a change in the escalator provision, to change it from the 3.5% set out in the bill to an amount that is based on nominal growth in the GDP (1545) We're suggesting that it be done on the basis of a three-year averaging, knowing that medium-term growth projections suggest that nominal GDP growth can be expected to be in the 4.5% to 5.5% range. So you can see that it would represent a significant increase, but we believe, given the surplus of the federal government presently, it's something that is realizable and helpful in terms of our obligations under the Constitution and generally to ensure equality of c ...[+++]ondition across the country.