Traduction de «Piégeage en fin de cycle » (Français → Anglais) :

(a) the methodology for the calculation of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from fuels other than biofuels and from energy; methodologies for calculating greenhouse gas emissions from renewable liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin and for carbon capture and utilisation for transport purposes shall be adopted by 30 June 2016;

From taking the raw material to producing the building product, transporting it to the site, construction, building life, to end of use disposal, you look at the entire life cycle of the product and what the greenhouse gas and environmental footprint associated with different building techniques is.

60. Recognises the importance of applying CCS technology, where feasible, if the carbon emission reduction goals are to be achieved at the least possible cost, and acknowledges that procedural delays and financial shortfalls, as well as lack of commitment on the part of certain Member States, are likely to delay achievement of the European Council’s ambition of having up to 12 CCS demonstration projects in operation by 2015; calls on the Commission to publish a CCS Action Plan; recognises that CCS will not be appropriate in all circumstances, even by 2050, and may well be limited to large installations and the avoidance of industrial p ...[+++]rocess emissions; calls for support on breakthrough technologies in other areas in order to increase energy efficiency and lower energy consumption, and provide solutions outside the CCS framework;

59. Recognises the importance of applying CCS technology, where feasible, if the carbon emission reduction goals are to be achieved at the least possible cost, and acknowledges that procedural delays and financial shortfalls, as well as lack of commitment on the part of certain Member States, are likely to delay achievement of the European Council's ambition of having up to 12 CCS demonstration projects in operation by 2015; calls on the Commission to publish a CCS Action Plan; recognises that CCS will not be appropriate in all circumstances, even by 2050, and may well be limited to large installations and the avoidance of industrial p ...[+++]rocess emissions; calls for support on breakthrough technologies in other areas in order to increase energy efficiency and lower energy consumption, and provide solutions outside the CCS framework;

The Commission proposal for a Directive was, however, rejected for a variety of reasons by the Parliament during the first reading. These reasons included lack of most recent scientific results as the basis of the proposal, lack of EC-competence to deal with the welfare of wild animals, calls for the application of the subsidiarity principle with regard to the implementation in the EU of the humane trapping standards, general criticism towards the Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards, requests fore more freedom to address national and regional concerns with regard to trapping, requests for more benefits with regard to ani ...[+++]mal welfare and calls for an impact assessment.

1. Considers that the Commission has overemphasised Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), when it has not yet been proven in power generation and will not be a viable option for approximately 10 years; remains concerned about the significant questions that still surround the safety, environmental impact, technological feasibility, legal status and cost of emerging CCS technologies; stresses that a fundamental problem with CCS is one of cost, as to be a widely adopted and available option the cost would need to be cut from up to USD100 a tonne to approximately USD10 a tonne; insists that attention not be redirected from developing renewabl ...[+++]e energy, which is an available, viable option; insists that, for CO2 emission stabilisation, CCS must be viewed as a transitional complement to increased renewable energy and efficiency and must not be used to promote an increase in coal use;