Traduction de «Politique de résorption des excédents » (Français → Anglais) :

6. If a European political foundation within the meaning of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council realises a surplus of income over expenditure at the end of a financial year in which it received an operating grant, the part of that surplus corresponding to up to 25 % of the total income for that year may, by derogation from the no-profit principle laid down in paragraph 4 of this Article, be carried over to the following year provided that it is used before the end of the first quarter of that following year.

6. If a political party at Union level realises a surplus of income over expenditure at the end of a financial year in which it received an operating grant, the part of that surplus corresponding to up to 25 % of the total income for that year may, by derogation from the no-profit principle laid down in paragraph 4, be carried over to the following year provided that it is used before the end of the first quarter of that following year.

9. The provisions of paragraph 8 shall not apply if the financial reserves of a political party at European level exceed 100 % of the average annual income of the former.

12. Stresses that the Commission's proposals to maintain the distillation or withdrawal of by-products without funding do not make sense, since distillation concerns wine producers, but is carried out by distillers, which in effect makes the measure inoperative; stresses also that the Commission proposal for the controlled withdrawal of wine by-products will create serious environmental problems in major wine-producing regions; notes that the proposal for abolishing dual-purpose distillation will lead to the vinification of large volumes, thereby significantly disrupting the regional and European market and creating problems within regions; points out that, as the Commission proposal sug ...[+++]gests, a failure to absorb existing surpluses will create shock waves which will significantly affect the market and wine-growers" incomes;

12. Stresses that the Commission's proposals to maintain the distillation or withdrawal of by-products without funding do not make sense, since distillation concerns wine producers, but is carried out by distillers, which in effect makes the measure inoperative; stresses also that the Commission proposal for the controlled withdrawal of wine by-products will create serious environmental problems in major wine-producing regions; notes that the proposal for abolishing dual-purpose distillation will lead to the vinification of large volumes, thereby significantly disrupting the regional and European market and creating problems within regions; points out that, as the Commission proposal sug ...[+++]gests, a failure to absorb existing surpluses will create shock waves which will significantly affect the market and wine-growers" incomes;

13. Stresses that the Commission’s proposals to maintain the distillation or withdrawal of by-products without funding do not make sense, since distillation concerns wine producers, but is carried out by distillers, which in effect makes the measure inoperative; stresses also that the Commission proposal for the controlled withdrawal of wine by-products will create serious environmental problems in major wine-producing regions; notes that the proposal for abolishing dual-purpose distillation will lead to the vinification of large volumes, thereby significantly disrupting the regional and European market and creating problems within regions; points out that, as the Commission proposal sug ...[+++]gests, a failure to absorb existing surpluses will create shock waves which will significantly affect the market and wine-growers’ incomes;