Traduction de «Pratique du contrôle de la situation aérienne » (Français → Anglais) :

7. Deplores the fact that Regulation (EC) No 868/2004 on protection against unfair pricing practices in the air transport sector has proved to be inadequate and ineffective in terms of scope; asks the Commission to issue an analysis of the causes of its non-implementation by November 2015 at the latest; calls on the Commission to revise Regulation (EC) No 868/2004 in order to safeguard fair competition in EU external aviation relations and reinforce the competitive position of the EU aviation industry, prevent unfair competition mor ...[+++]e effectively, ensure reciprocity and eliminate unfair practices, including subsidies and state aid awarded to airlines from certain third countries that distort the market; stresses that the aim should be to improve the political strategy at European level in order to quickly resolve this conflict, based mainly on the application of a transparent ‘fair competition’ clause; calls also on the Commission to address the concept of ‘effective control’ of airlines;

Notes that, in adopting measures to counter UTPs within the food supply chain, due account must be taken of the specific features of each market and the legal requirements that apply to it, the different situations and approaches in individual Member States, the degree of consolidation or fragmentation of individual markets, and other significant factors, while also capitalising on measures already taken in some Member States that are proving to be effective; takes the view that any proposed regulatory efforts in this area should ensure that there is relatively broad discretion to tailor the measures to be taken to the specific features ...[+++] of each market, in order to avoid adopting a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach, and should be based on the general principle of improving enforcement by involving the relevant public bodies alongside the concept of private enforcement, thus also contributing to improving the fragmented and low level of cooperation that exists within different national enforcement bodies and to addressing cross-border challenges regarding UTPs.

2. Where, due to circumstances that were unforeseeable at the time of adoption of the performance plans and are both insurmountable and beyond the control of the Member States, air navigation service providers and the Network Manager, the alert threshold(s) in Article 10(4) is/are reached at local level over a calendar year, the national supervisory authorities concerned shall review the situation liaising with the Commission and m ...[+++]ake proposals for appropriate actions within four months.

1. Where, due to circumstances that were unforeseeable at the time of adoption of the performance plans and are both insurmountable and beyond the control of the Member States, air navigation service providers and the Network Manager, the alert threshold(s) in Article 10(4) is/are reached at Union level over a calendar year, the Commission shall review the situation in consultation with the Member States through the Single Sky Comm ...[+++]ittee, and make proposals for appropriate actions within four months.

Following the deregulation of the market, airlines have been entrusting the pre-takeoff inspection of aircraft (PFI) required by aircraft manufacturers to pilots and unspecialised officials in order to reduce the operational cost of maintaining and controlling aircraft and to increase profits: this means an increased risk to aircraft safety.

5. Where cross-border activities take place, Member States shall ensure that a common set of procedures to manage specific traffic situations and to enhance real time airspace management is agreed between civil air traffic services units and military air traffic services units and/or controlling military units which are concerned by those activities.